Active Users:1237 Time:23/11/2024 02:47:38 AM
The DO is the opposite of the Creator. And you can't destroy destruction *NM* Crackbrained Asha'man Send a noteboard - 06/11/2009 01:37:36 AM
I wonder if it theoretically would work to kill the DO with the Choedan Kal, or at least close the Bore with that Power.

Rand says at the end of TGS that he has enough Power to Unravel the Pattern, which probably means he is as powerful as the DO, if he would completely break free.

Also some AS in the AoL and Lanfear believed that at least both Choedan Kal together had enough Power to challenge the DO or the Creator.

RJ confirmed in a Q&A that one could theoretically kill the DO with balefire, but it would destroy the world.
Q: Why doesn't somebody just balefire the Dark One?
RJ: The quantity necessary would destroy the world.

So, do you think that it had been actually possible to kill the DO (or the Creator) with the Choedan Kal? And if that is the case, wouldn't it be also possible - as a minus - to close his prison with the Choedan Kal at least? Or would any of these actions automatically destroy Creation?
While the wicked stand confounded call me, with thy saint surrounded
Reply to message
Kill the DO? - 05/11/2009 03:53:59 PM 929 Views
philosophically, no way. - 05/11/2009 04:20:56 PM 565 Views
Re: Kill the DO? tGS *minor spoilers* - 05/11/2009 04:39:43 PM 675 Views
Why is this even relavant? *spoilers* - 05/11/2009 05:15:52 PM 587 Views
They've both been destroyed now - 05/11/2009 08:23:47 PM 491 Views
The CK were needed... - 05/11/2009 09:11:56 PM 521 Views
The Wolf King is also mentioned, IIRC... *NM* - 05/11/2009 11:54:15 PM 205 Views
Re: Kill the DO? tGS *minor spoilers* - 05/11/2009 06:03:35 PM 543 Views
Nobody can kill the DO... - 05/11/2009 11:04:45 PM 486 Views
The DO is the opposite of the Creator. And you can't destroy destruction *NM* - 06/11/2009 01:37:36 AM 210 Views
Is he? And why is it called The Last Battle? - 06/11/2009 02:33:21 AM 487 Views
Re: Is he? And why is it called The Last Battle? - 07/11/2009 09:22:14 PM 482 Views

Reply to Message