Active Users:501 Time:01/11/2024 02:03:51 PM
Yes. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM
I don't believe in slavery, and especially not when it is used to change a conscious being with free will into an automaton. The Seanchan sacrifice a lot of what I consider to be human attributes in exchange for order.

Even worse, Tuon and other sul'dam are channelers, as well. According to their standards, even if they choose not to learn, they are still "unclean". She is very much a hypocrit.

Understanding their history doesn't excuse their inhumanity, and I'm not too impressed with peace achieved by tyranny - that is esentially what the Seanchan impose.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam? - 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM 1435 Views
Yes, but not me - 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM 702 Views
Re: Yes, but not me - 31/10/2009 12:49:42 AM 647 Views
I hated him - 31/10/2009 12:57:52 AM 633 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM 802 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM 654 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan - 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM 688 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal - 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM 646 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM* - 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM 248 Views
The big shiney ball thing he destroyed at the end of the book - 01/11/2009 07:50:15 PM 591 Views
Destroyed. My point exactly. *NM* - 06/11/2009 04:40:16 AM 234 Views
For what? - 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM 642 Views
I dont think it's compulsion. - 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM 581 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. - 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM 556 Views
He did the same thing with Cady - 31/10/2009 12:25:51 AM 567 Views
Personally, I thought he was using the TP to do those things. - 04/11/2009 07:37:31 PM 524 Views
It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO - 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM 469 Views
No - 31/10/2009 12:06:13 AM 595 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear? - 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM 678 Views
You dont really get it. - 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM 528 Views
That is just POV trap - 31/10/2009 04:20:07 PM 520 Views
Flawed Argument - 31/10/2009 08:54:05 PM 513 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences. - 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM 619 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued... - 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM 616 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT. - 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM 509 Views
That's complete hogwash. - 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM 557 Views
Think it through - 31/10/2009 10:25:08 PM 642 Views
I have... - 31/10/2009 11:05:20 PM 610 Views
Re: I have... - 01/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 774 Views
Well that was rather silly. - 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM 485 Views
Several valid points... - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM 564 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed - 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM 528 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be. - 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM 511 Views
^ *NM* - 31/10/2009 05:33:04 AM 227 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom - 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM 531 Views
Due to their conditioning. - 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM 544 Views
Random - 31/10/2009 10:26:34 AM 523 Views
Agreed - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM 513 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM 463 Views

Reply to Message