I though we all agree the majority of AS are "power hungry megalomaniacs if left free" from all the gleemen's stories and the general opinions of Randland folks, so what is the argument?
What Gleeman's stories?
And Randland fols vary from deep distrust to genuine respect and regard for the Aes Sedai, so I'm clueless on ow you make this generalization.
Either way, we as objective readers know that while Aes Sedai want power, they are far from megalomaniacs as a whole, do not resort to bullying (until recently, with Elaida), and deliberately fetter their power by refusing to use it in any destructive fashion. There can be no comparison between the way the Aes Sedai use the One Power and the way the Seanchan Empire does.
Given the state of affairs, you either be anger toward ALL of them, or consider it just a fact of the world. Cannoli clearly stated one is not worse than any other factions.
But they are. The Aes Sedai are mistrusted, but not tyrants who rule by fear (unlike the vaunted Seanchan Empire). Aes Sedai seek to use their power to stop wars, and never use their vast power to enforce their will on the populace.
Take, for example, Artur Hawkwing's siege of Tar Valon. Had this been Seandar, and Hawkwing a rival claimant for Tuon's throne with no damane, Tuon wouldn't hesitate in chopping up his army with her damane.
The Aes Sedai, with all thier sa'angreal and angreal, could have give the siege the short shrift, but instead waited for 20 years, and then negotiated their way out.
Then, rather than retaliating for the sake of revenge (like Tuon would have), they instead tried to keep Hawkwing's empire alive.
This situation quite clearly shows the deep hypocrisy in Seanchan policy toward the One Power. They have become the very tyrants they claim to fear.
Hypocrisy means accepting the wrong done by your own folks, and being angry at the same wrong done by foreigners.
What wrong has the Tower committed that is in the range of capturing all women who can channel and then torturing them into being obedient slaves?
This message last edited by fionwe1987 on 31/10/2009 at 10:24:12 PM
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam?
30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM
- 1435 Views
Yes, but not me
30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM
- 701 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM
- 802 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM
- 653 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan
31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM
- 688 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal
31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM
- 646 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM*
31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM
- 248 Views
For what?
31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM
- 641 Views
if he was it wasn't on purpose. I think he was just actively trying to use his ta'verenness *NM*
31/10/2009 12:15:32 AM
- 256 Views
I dont think it's compulsion.
31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM
- 580 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around.
31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
- 556 Views
I don't care for Tuon at all. I'd be okay if her and the Seanchan were obliterated. *NM*
31/10/2009 12:44:22 AM
- 253 Views
And how is that any different from me with Egwene (except she & I are the same race)? *NM*
31/10/2009 04:51:17 AM
- 260 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear?
31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM
- 677 Views
You dont really get it.
31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM
- 528 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences.
31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM
- 619 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued...
31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM
- 616 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT.
31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM
- 509 Views
That's complete hogwash.
31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM
- 557 Views
Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
01/11/2009 05:44:16 AM
- 580 Views
Re: Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
05/11/2009 02:54:52 AM
- 875 Views
Well that was rather silly.
31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM
- 485 Views
And a generation later, the same old problem arises. New channelers, with no one to stop them.
31/10/2009 10:28:35 PM
- 512 Views
Several valid points...
31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM
- 563 Views
I wonder what if Egwene happen to be a child kidnapped at Flame and sent to WT
31/10/2009 06:30:34 PM
- 569 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed
31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM
- 528 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be.
31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM
- 510 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom
31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM
- 530 Views
Due to their conditioning.
31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM
- 544 Views
She will (and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
- 250 Views
I think the a'dam is the perfect solution for Blacks and the Shaido 'Wise Ones'.
01/11/2009 02:51:27 AM
- 587 Views