Active Users:1044 Time:23/12/2024 06:29:08 PM
Several valid points... Legolas Send a noteboard - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM
but for me personally, and I think for a lot of people, those points are not sufficient to justify the practice. I do agree that it would be unreasonable to expect the Seanchan to immediately give up the practice, considering your points but on the other hand it would be equally unreasonable to expect the Aes Sedai (or Aiel, or Seafolk) to be okay with them doing it. And it certainly is something that makes it harder to cheer for them - it's entirely intentional, of course, that RJ and now Sanderson keep harping on how solid rulers the Seanchans are, how they are rather good rulers for the average citizen, at the cost of the horrible treatment of one small group of citizens. A good way of keeping them grey and keeping them from being BFFs with the main cast, I'd say - the moment Tuon gives up that stance, if she ever does, she and her whole people become much less interesting from a plot tension point of view.
Reply to message
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam? - 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM 1460 Views
Yes, but not me - 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM 722 Views
Re: Yes, but not me - 31/10/2009 12:49:42 AM 664 Views
I hated him - 31/10/2009 12:57:52 AM 655 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM 838 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM 677 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan - 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM 711 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal - 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM 663 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM* - 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM 257 Views
The big shiney ball thing he destroyed at the end of the book - 01/11/2009 07:50:15 PM 611 Views
Destroyed. My point exactly. *NM* - 06/11/2009 04:40:16 AM 243 Views
For what? - 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM 661 Views
I dont think it's compulsion. - 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM 602 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. - 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM 579 Views
He did the same thing with Cady - 31/10/2009 12:25:51 AM 590 Views
Personally, I thought he was using the TP to do those things. - 04/11/2009 07:37:31 PM 545 Views
It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO - 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM 491 Views
No - 31/10/2009 12:06:13 AM 616 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear? - 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM 701 Views
You dont really get it. - 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM 548 Views
That is just POV trap - 31/10/2009 04:20:07 PM 538 Views
Flawed Argument - 31/10/2009 08:54:05 PM 538 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences. - 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM 644 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued... - 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM 635 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT. - 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM 527 Views
That's complete hogwash. - 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM 584 Views
Think it through - 31/10/2009 10:25:08 PM 663 Views
I have... - 31/10/2009 11:05:20 PM 630 Views
Re: I have... - 01/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 797 Views
Well that was rather silly. - 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM 502 Views
Several valid points... - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM 591 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed - 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM 559 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be. - 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM 537 Views
^ *NM* - 31/10/2009 05:33:04 AM 235 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom - 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM 551 Views
Due to their conditioning. - 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM 566 Views
Random - 31/10/2009 10:26:34 AM 541 Views
Agreed - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM 534 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM 488 Views

Reply to Message