The idea should be abolished, and dropped into the ocean like the male a'dam was supposed to be, but the Sul'dam themselves? No.
And she refused. Therefore if the sul'dam come for channelers they should be destroyed, just like Egwene destroyed them. The sul'dam are also notoriously sadistic, probably as part of their training. The world doesn't need people like that.
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam?
30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM
- 1460 Views
Yes, but not me
30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM
- 722 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM
- 838 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM
- 677 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan
31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM
- 711 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal
31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM
- 663 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM*
31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM
- 257 Views
For what?
31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM
- 661 Views
if he was it wasn't on purpose. I think he was just actively trying to use his ta'verenness *NM*
31/10/2009 12:15:32 AM
- 265 Views
I dont think it's compulsion.
31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM
- 602 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around.
31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
- 578 Views
I don't care for Tuon at all. I'd be okay if her and the Seanchan were obliterated. *NM*
31/10/2009 12:44:22 AM
- 261 Views
And how is that any different from me with Egwene (except she & I are the same race)? *NM*
31/10/2009 04:51:17 AM
- 269 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear?
31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM
- 701 Views
You dont really get it.
31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM
- 548 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences.
31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM
- 643 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued...
31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM
- 635 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT.
31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM
- 527 Views
That's complete hogwash.
31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM
- 584 Views
Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
01/11/2009 05:44:16 AM
- 602 Views
Re: Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
05/11/2009 02:54:52 AM
- 898 Views
Well that was rather silly.
31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM
- 502 Views
And a generation later, the same old problem arises. New channelers, with no one to stop them.
31/10/2009 10:28:35 PM
- 534 Views
Several valid points...
31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM
- 590 Views
I wonder what if Egwene happen to be a child kidnapped at Flame and sent to WT
31/10/2009 06:30:34 PM
- 589 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed
31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM
- 559 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be.
31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM
- 537 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom
31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM
- 551 Views
Due to their conditioning.
31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM
- 566 Views
She will (and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
- 257 Views
Agreed
31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM
- 534 Views
I think the a'dam is the perfect solution for Blacks and the Shaido 'Wise Ones'.
01/11/2009 02:51:27 AM
- 610 Views