Active Users:483 Time:01/11/2024 02:01:04 PM
Re: Yes, but not me Saruto Send a noteboard - 31/10/2009 12:49:42 AM
Tuon is one of my favorite characters. RJ made me like her despite the horribleness of the a'dam.

But it also helps that I'm convinced she (and the rest of the Seanchan) will see the error of their ways before the series is over. If she doesn't, then I might have to change my mind. Maybe that's a stupid reason to like someone. For a decision they'll make later on. But I loved her in WH, KoD, and tGS, and I didn't want Rand's ta'verenness to be the reason they got a truce. Rand was annoying me more than Tuon at that point.


Dark Halo Rand was too awesome to be annoying. Trying to stop people's hearts by bending the Pattern to his will = pure unrivaled badassery.
Reply to message
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam? - 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM 1435 Views
Yes, but not me - 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM 701 Views
Re: Yes, but not me - 31/10/2009 12:49:42 AM 647 Views
I hated him - 31/10/2009 12:57:52 AM 633 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM 802 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM 654 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan - 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM 688 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal - 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM 646 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM* - 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM 248 Views
The big shiney ball thing he destroyed at the end of the book - 01/11/2009 07:50:15 PM 591 Views
Destroyed. My point exactly. *NM* - 06/11/2009 04:40:16 AM 234 Views
For what? - 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM 641 Views
I dont think it's compulsion. - 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM 581 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. - 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM 556 Views
He did the same thing with Cady - 31/10/2009 12:25:51 AM 567 Views
Personally, I thought he was using the TP to do those things. - 04/11/2009 07:37:31 PM 524 Views
It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO - 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM 469 Views
No - 31/10/2009 12:06:13 AM 595 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear? - 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM 677 Views
You dont really get it. - 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM 528 Views
That is just POV trap - 31/10/2009 04:20:07 PM 520 Views
Flawed Argument - 31/10/2009 08:54:05 PM 512 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences. - 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM 619 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued... - 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM 616 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT. - 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM 509 Views
That's complete hogwash. - 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM 557 Views
Think it through - 31/10/2009 10:25:08 PM 642 Views
I have... - 31/10/2009 11:05:20 PM 610 Views
Re: I have... - 01/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 774 Views
Well that was rather silly. - 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM 485 Views
Several valid points... - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM 563 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed - 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM 528 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be. - 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM 510 Views
^ *NM* - 31/10/2009 05:33:04 AM 227 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom - 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM 531 Views
Due to their conditioning. - 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM 544 Views
Random - 31/10/2009 10:26:34 AM 523 Views
Agreed - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM 513 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM 462 Views

Reply to Message