I might have to check again, but I'm pretty sure Rand was Compelling her. It makes me like/admire Tuon even more.
Ὦ ξεῖν', ἀγγέλλειν Λακεδαιμονίοις ὅτι τῇδε
κείμεθα, τοῖς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.
κείμεθα, τοῖς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam?
- 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM
1635 Views
Yes, but not me
- 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM
904 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM
1021 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM
869 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan
- 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM
912 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal
- 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM
863 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM
347 Views
For what?
- 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM
845 Views
if he was it wasn't on purpose. I think he was just actively trying to use his ta'verenness *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:15:32 AM
355 Views
I dont think it's compulsion.
- 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM
792 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around.
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
768 Views
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
768 Views
I don't care for Tuon at all. I'd be okay if her and the Seanchan were obliterated. *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:44:22 AM
346 Views
And how is that any different from me with Egwene (except she & I are the same race)? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 04:51:17 AM
354 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear?
- 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM
881 Views
You dont really get it.
- 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM
750 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences.
- 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM
846 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued...
- 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM
844 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT.
- 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM
728 Views
That's complete hogwash.
- 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM
759 Views
Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 01/11/2009 05:44:16 AM
785 Views
Re: Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 05/11/2009 02:54:52 AM
1086 Views
Well that was rather silly.
- 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM
696 Views
And a generation later, the same old problem arises. New channelers, with no one to stop them.
- 31/10/2009 10:28:35 PM
696 Views
Several valid points...
- 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM
793 Views
I wonder what if Egwene happen to be a child kidnapped at Flame and sent to WT
- 31/10/2009 06:30:34 PM
787 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed
- 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM
736 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be.
- 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM
740 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom
- 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM
729 Views
Due to their conditioning.
- 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM
757 Views
She will
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
353 Views
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
353 Views
I think the a'dam is the perfect solution for Blacks and the Shaido 'Wise Ones'.
- 01/11/2009 02:51:27 AM
808 Views
