Active Users:385 Time:26/04/2025 08:38:01 PM
Re: The candidates for Mesaana itsjustme Send a noteboard - 30/10/2009 11:51:26 PM
Yeah, Laras crossed my mind too. Given that her helping Siuan escape helped further chaos at the time, she probably would be at least a candidate. Then again, we often see those with disguises that are power wrought don't like to be touched as it can mess with the image. Laras has never kept her distance from anyone. I'll go with unlikely, but plausible.

As for testing the novices and accepted, Nicola is the only one I saw mentioned as being tested, and that was before the Seanchan raid. Made me wonder why they thought about testing novices then but don't seem to think of it later??? Seems odd. I also seem to remember Alviarin (I think it was her) wondering if she wasn't hiding as an accepted or novice at one point.
Reply to message
The candidates for Mesaana - 30/10/2009 07:56:24 PM 1550 Views
I believe RJ has stated that one CAN "reduce" their power level - 30/10/2009 08:02:36 PM 789 Views
Re: The candidates for Mesaana - 30/10/2009 08:34:12 PM 1024 Views
I was just thinking the same thing as your end point. - 30/10/2009 09:02:54 PM 1362 Views
Re: The candidates for Mesaana - 30/10/2009 11:51:26 PM 760 Views
So...Danelle? - 31/10/2009 12:07:10 AM 778 Views
Danelle is only a possibility if she tricked the oath rod, so she's unlikely - 31/10/2009 12:18:53 AM 820 Views
Which has very interesting implications - 31/10/2009 05:16:35 AM 772 Views
Forsaken are immortal, so their lifespan are not effected by Oath Rod. - 31/10/2009 03:30:25 PM 727 Views
No - time didn't pass while they were Sealed. Now it does. *NM* - 28/11/2009 02:59:27 PM 314 Views
What about AS who left the tower before the Seanchan attack? *NM* - 28/11/2009 03:00:48 PM 301 Views
BS said Mesaana is still in the WT. - 28/11/2009 03:07:17 PM 626 Views
I think she would have choked on the latter. - 31/10/2009 05:41:24 AM 698 Views
Re: The candidates for Mesaana - 31/10/2009 01:19:28 PM 811 Views
Lara's has a job - 01/11/2009 04:44:26 AM 733 Views

Reply to Message