Although, I have to say I can't wait to read the Tuon point of view when her raiding party comes back and tells them about this one Aes Sedai who single handedly kicked all their asses! That should scare the heck out of her, especially if the ones she captured are able to say that was "only" a novice.
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam?
- 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM
1459 Views
Yes, but not me
- 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM
722 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM
838 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM
677 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan
- 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM
711 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal
- 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM
663 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM
257 Views
For what?
- 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM
661 Views
if he was it wasn't on purpose. I think he was just actively trying to use his ta'verenness *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:15:32 AM
265 Views
I dont think it's compulsion.
- 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM
601 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. 
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
578 Views
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
578 Views
I don't care for Tuon at all. I'd be okay if her and the Seanchan were obliterated. *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:44:22 AM
261 Views
And how is that any different from me with Egwene (except she & I are the same race)? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 04:51:17 AM
269 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear?
- 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM
701 Views
You dont really get it.
- 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM
547 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences.
- 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM
643 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued...
- 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM
635 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT.
- 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM
527 Views
That's complete hogwash.
- 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM
584 Views
Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 01/11/2009 05:44:16 AM
601 Views
Re: Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 05/11/2009 02:54:52 AM
898 Views
Well that was rather silly.
- 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM
502 Views
And a generation later, the same old problem arises. New channelers, with no one to stop them.
- 31/10/2009 10:28:35 PM
533 Views
Several valid points...
- 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM
590 Views
I wonder what if Egwene happen to be a child kidnapped at Flame and sent to WT
- 31/10/2009 06:30:34 PM
589 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed
- 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM
559 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be.
- 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM
536 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom
- 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM
550 Views
Due to their conditioning.
- 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM
565 Views
She will 
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
257 Views
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
257 Views
I think the a'dam is the perfect solution for Blacks and the Shaido 'Wise Ones'.
- 01/11/2009 02:51:27 AM
610 Views