Active Users:1104 Time:22/11/2024 10:06:08 PM
Caemlyn is a possibility, but I still think Tar Valon will be the converging point. Segovia Send a noteboard - 28/10/2009 08:38:30 PM
Although Caemlyn might make sense for Rand, Mat, and Perrin, the Horn is still in the Tower as far as we know, and I doubt Rand and Mat will reunite before Mat's journey to the ToG. (I suspect Rand's surprise reunion with Moiraine will be a highlight of the book; if he meets with Mat beforehand, he'll learn what Mat is up to, which would drastically lessen the impact of Moiraine's reappearance.)
Reply to message
Early speculation for ToM: can Sanderson really pull it off? - 28/10/2009 03:43:03 PM 1106 Views
Re: Early speculation for ToM: can Sanderson really pull it off? - 28/10/2009 06:41:44 PM 765 Views
Right, hence my upping the number from four or five to seven or eight. *NM* - 28/10/2009 06:44:40 PM 258 Views
You missed my point... - 28/10/2009 07:08:24 PM 670 Views
That makes sense, though Mat and Perrin have a long way to go before reuniting with him. - 28/10/2009 07:11:39 PM 622 Views
Not that long... - 28/10/2009 07:21:00 PM 591 Views
Caemlyn is a possibility, but I still think Tar Valon will be the converging point. - 28/10/2009 08:38:30 PM 569 Views
OTOH, TV might be a hard sell to Tuon. *NM* - 28/10/2009 08:54:27 PM 237 Views
lol *NM* - 28/10/2009 11:36:47 PM 227 Views
I can't decide - 28/10/2009 11:39:24 PM 617 Views
TV vs. Caemlyn - 28/10/2009 11:43:50 PM 656 Views
Interesting idea - 28/10/2009 11:58:38 PM 503 Views
I'm still hoping it'll be TV, but Caemlyn makes more and more sense. *NM* - 29/10/2009 12:00:53 AM 233 Views
I think there's plenty of room - 28/10/2009 11:55:02 PM 649 Views
Logain and Taim - 28/10/2009 11:59:45 PM 523 Views
I edited the post right when you replied - 29/10/2009 12:01:22 AM 521 Views
I could easily be misremembering about Logain-Taim being a cluster. Does anyone else remember that? *NM* - 29/10/2009 12:03:27 AM 245 Views
Either way, it makes sense - 29/10/2009 12:05:51 AM 548 Views
Yup - 29/10/2009 12:15:12 AM 754 Views

Reply to Message