Active Users:1206 Time:22/11/2024 03:50:55 PM
Report: tGS concentrates on Secondary plotlines, it seems. (No Spoilers) fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 19/10/2009 03:44:44 PM
According to Pat of Pat's Fantasy Hotlist. He said in Westeros' Literature forum that tGS was the WoT equivalent of Erikson's Toll the Hounds, in that there was good stuff in the book, but 2/3rds of it concentrated on secondary plot lines.

Given that the book focuses on Egwene and Rand, I wonder what he means. Does he consider Graendal, Aviendha, the BA hunters, Elaida and Siuan to be secondary characters whose stories are unimportant for TG?

Also, apprently, Sanderson cannot do Mat very well.

PS: Posted this separately since this is not a review and does not contain any actual spoilers.
Reply to message
Report: tGS concentrates on Secondary plotlines, it seems. (No Spoilers) - 19/10/2009 03:44:44 PM 1559 Views
Odd. - 19/10/2009 04:06:29 PM 718 Views
I'm waiting for that review... - 19/10/2009 04:10:59 PM 690 Views
I'll NB you everything I got from him. I didn't want spoilers, though. - 19/10/2009 04:16:14 PM 635 Views
Re: I'll NB you everything I got from him. I didn't want spoilers, though. - 19/10/2009 04:40:20 PM 622 Views
Done. *NM* - 19/10/2009 04:44:00 PM 268 Views
Thanks! *NM* - 19/10/2009 04:56:58 PM 228 Views
Me too? - 20/10/2009 05:14:43 AM 519 Views
Could you NB me a copy as well? I'm a big no-spoilers kinda guy - 19/10/2009 08:07:19 PM 494 Views
Please send me the review, as well. - 19/10/2009 07:34:00 PM 521 Views
I also like NB messages - 19/10/2009 08:03:21 PM 496 Views
Re: I'm waiting for that review... - 19/10/2009 11:25:11 PM 491 Views
Re: I'm waiting for that review... - 20/10/2009 12:19:06 AM 546 Views
Odd - 19/10/2009 06:17:09 PM 682 Views
Please NB me too? - 20/10/2009 07:29:42 PM 531 Views
WHAT!? - 19/10/2009 11:27:52 PM 582 Views
I hope he writes Mat well for fairly obvious reasons *NM* - 20/10/2009 03:47:05 AM 291 Views
Can't do Mat WELL!!!!!!!!!!!!? - 20/10/2009 07:24:24 PM 542 Views
Nonsense in hindsight. *NM* - 03/11/2009 10:51:11 AM 227 Views
Yup. - 03/11/2009 05:34:26 PM 469 Views

Reply to Message