Active Users:1326 Time:18/01/2025 07:13:51 AM
You have to understand... vandevere Send a noteboard - 31/08/2009 05:49:58 PM
So in TSR, Asmodean, in his alias, the Gleeman Nateel, performs what appears to be an epic song about Manetherin for the Aiel and company during their trip to Cold Rock Hold.

Here is my question: Is that really how he spent his time since being released from his 3000 year prison term? I mean Rahvin, Belal, Sammael and, to a lesser extent Graendal and Messana, have set themselves up as rulers of nations. Lanfear is spending her time shadowing Rand. Ishmael and Demandred have a number of schemes going on.

But apparently Asmodean has spent his time memorizing the details of epic poems/songs.


Asmo's an artiste...

If the human brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't understand it.
Reply to message
Asmodean: Idiot or Savant? - 31/08/2009 05:48:10 PM 1269 Views
You have to understand... - 31/08/2009 05:49:58 PM 883 Views
It's true--he was an artist first and foremost, and a Forsaken second - 31/08/2009 06:45:41 PM 1039 Views
Who are you calling an idiot?! *NM* - 31/08/2009 07:06:39 PM 354 Views
I don't think he's a powerful Forsaken - 31/08/2009 07:14:13 PM 887 Views
and yet, he survived - 31/08/2009 07:19:26 PM 751 Views
I agree and disagree - 31/08/2009 07:35:27 PM 996 Views
Interesting, who were the six? - 31/08/2009 08:10:38 PM 778 Views
Re: Interesting, who were the six? - 31/08/2009 09:16:40 PM 746 Views
Yep - 31/08/2009 08:19:55 PM 741 Views
Re: Yep - 31/08/2009 09:27:33 PM 718 Views
Re: Yep - 03/11/2009 07:40:36 PM 675 Views
Re: Yep - 01/09/2009 06:13:15 AM 677 Views
Asmodean had a third name *NM* - 01/09/2009 01:59:07 PM 312 Views
Re: Asmodean had a third name - 04/09/2009 03:05:12 AM 636 Views
Actually that's not true - 02/09/2009 01:26:01 AM 670 Views
If he had reached Choedan Kal earlier that time... - 01/09/2009 02:29:29 AM 692 Views
I think he would have blasted Rand out of existence, but would have been culled. - 03/09/2009 06:55:12 PM 776 Views

Reply to Message