Active Users:612 Time:24/12/2024 05:28:24 PM
I'd like you to clear this up... Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM
In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.


I'd like evidence that severing requires precision weaving. Not that I'm sure what precision weaving is either. Is this about that female-strength bit?

Also, are you saying there's no evidence that women weaker than Egwene or Elayne can sever channelers? 'Cause that'd be pretty ridiculous. Not only have the Tower been severing people long before channelers of the wondergirls' strength level came along, but if you count the illegal gentling of men following the Aiel War, you have typical pre-EotW strength women severing male channelers (typically stronger than the average women, to say nothing of 'Morgase or Sorilea' and surely without a large circle - there is no way that you could gather, say, thirteen extremist Reds together outside the Tower any time you wanted to perform an illegal gentling.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 1992 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 594 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 312 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 747 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 977 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1104 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 704 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1268 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 722 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 280 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 998 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 585 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 607 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 553 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 609 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 669 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 675 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 576 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 594 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 653 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 586 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 641 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 788 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 683 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 620 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 714 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 707 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 773 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 585 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 811 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 662 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1336 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 684 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 759 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1272 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 593 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 694 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1366 Views

Reply to Message