Active Users:424 Time:28/04/2025 05:42:36 PM
I'd like you to clear this up... Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM
In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.


I'd like evidence that severing requires precision weaving. Not that I'm sure what precision weaving is either. Is this about that female-strength bit?

Also, are you saying there's no evidence that women weaker than Egwene or Elayne can sever channelers? 'Cause that'd be pretty ridiculous. Not only have the Tower been severing people long before channelers of the wondergirls' strength level came along, but if you count the illegal gentling of men following the Aiel War, you have typical pre-EotW strength women severing male channelers (typically stronger than the average women, to say nothing of 'Morgase or Sorilea' and surely without a large circle - there is no way that you could gather, say, thirteen extremist Reds together outside the Tower any time you wanted to perform an illegal gentling.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2072 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 668 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 344 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 814 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1061 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1172 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 782 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1338 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 790 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 308 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1080 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 660 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 685 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 627 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 692 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 736 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 753 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 653 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 669 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 727 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 669 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 709 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 872 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 757 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 700 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 805 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 778 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 836 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 666 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 885 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 739 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1431 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 754 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 831 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1369 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 663 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 779 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1452 Views

Reply to Message