Active Users:1163 Time:23/11/2024 06:22:59 AM
I'd like you to clear this up... Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM
In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.


I'd like evidence that severing requires precision weaving. Not that I'm sure what precision weaving is either. Is this about that female-strength bit?

Also, are you saying there's no evidence that women weaker than Egwene or Elayne can sever channelers? 'Cause that'd be pretty ridiculous. Not only have the Tower been severing people long before channelers of the wondergirls' strength level came along, but if you count the illegal gentling of men following the Aiel War, you have typical pre-EotW strength women severing male channelers (typically stronger than the average women, to say nothing of 'Morgase or Sorilea' and surely without a large circle - there is no way that you could gather, say, thirteen extremist Reds together outside the Tower any time you wanted to perform an illegal gentling.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 1977 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 581 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 305 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 731 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 957 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1084 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 688 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1251 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 706 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 271 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 980 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 569 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 592 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 537 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 589 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 653 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 659 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 560 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 576 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 634 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 568 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 621 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 771 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 663 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 602 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 698 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 689 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 757 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 567 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 794 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 642 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1321 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 664 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 745 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1254 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 576 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 680 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1352 Views

Reply to Message