Active Users:349 Time:09/04/2025 09:16:42 AM
Re: Great review. DomA Send a noteboard - 05/10/2009 08:29:18 PM
I thought people were saying that Tor confirmed that no other review copies would be forthcoming. Glad that info proved wrong for the sake of getting a second review out there.


If you're referring to what I said, you're misquoting me.

I never said no more authorized review would come, I said Tor sent no ARC and it was not confirmed if they'd send anyone the finished book early enough for advanced reviews.

This review has nothing to do with that :)
Reply to message
another review of TGS (from Tar Valon.net) - 02/10/2009 08:20:09 PM 2199 Views
Great review. - 02/10/2009 10:03:59 PM 724 Views
Re: Great review. - 02/10/2009 11:14:45 PM 714 Views
Yup, such is always the case. - 02/10/2009 11:16:28 PM 719 Views
I wonder if a NDA is involved - 03/10/2009 08:14:54 AM 739 Views
Looking forward to said review. I'll have my towel on hand. - 03/10/2009 12:26:17 PM 743 Views
maybe - 05/10/2009 05:14:04 PM 598 Views
How do you know? What if she's wrong? *NM* - 03/10/2009 11:23:20 AM 272 Views
Re: Great review. - 05/10/2009 08:29:18 PM 684 Views
Sounds promising *NM* - 02/10/2009 11:30:23 PM 291 Views
Re: another review of TGS (from Tar Valon.net) - 03/10/2009 12:03:22 AM 734 Views
That's a review? - 03/10/2009 01:51:59 AM 752 Views
True, more 'I liked it' - 03/10/2009 08:52:44 AM 633 Views
True, I could have written that review and haven't read the book. *NM* - 04/10/2009 03:29:34 PM 281 Views
Sounds optimistic... - 03/10/2009 12:21:49 PM 927 Views
I found the optimism striking, actually. - 03/10/2009 01:19:54 PM 662 Views
Indeed. - 03/10/2009 01:23:48 PM 664 Views
Who says she can't get up and dance cause the DO won? *NM* - 05/10/2009 02:06:55 PM 289 Views
I think... - 05/10/2009 04:51:54 PM 657 Views
Thanks for the link! - 06/10/2009 04:26:54 AM 657 Views

Reply to Message