Active Users:607 Time:24/12/2024 05:37:36 PM
It's real stilling Sidious Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.

I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.

Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.


From Nynaeve's PoV in TSR it shows that it is a very sharp shield which permanently destroys your ability to channel. Egwene describes hers as a powerful and sharp shield too when she stills Amico. It doesn't require channeling... it merely requires a powerful channeler who is capable of precision weaving.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 1992 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 594 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 312 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 747 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 977 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1104 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 705 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1268 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 722 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 280 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 998 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 585 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 607 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 553 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 609 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 669 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 675 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 576 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 594 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 654 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 586 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 641 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 788 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 683 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 621 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 714 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 707 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 773 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 585 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 811 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 662 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1336 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 684 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 759 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1272 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 593 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 694 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1366 Views

Reply to Message