Active Users:406 Time:28/04/2025 05:45:04 PM
It's real stilling Sidious Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.

I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.

Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.


From Nynaeve's PoV in TSR it shows that it is a very sharp shield which permanently destroys your ability to channel. Egwene describes hers as a powerful and sharp shield too when she stills Amico. It doesn't require channeling... it merely requires a powerful channeler who is capable of precision weaving.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2072 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 668 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 345 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 814 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1061 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1172 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 783 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1338 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 791 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 308 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1080 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 660 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 685 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 627 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 692 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 736 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 753 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 653 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 669 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 727 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 669 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 709 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 872 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 758 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 700 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 805 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 778 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 836 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 666 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 885 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 740 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1431 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 754 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 831 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1369 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 663 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 779 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1452 Views

Reply to Message