Active Users:1285 Time:23/11/2024 06:36:50 AM
Is this the real stilling? Etzel Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.

I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.

Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 1977 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 581 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 305 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 732 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 958 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1085 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 688 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1251 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 706 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 271 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 980 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 569 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 592 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 538 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 589 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 654 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 659 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 560 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 577 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 635 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 569 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 621 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 771 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 664 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 604 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 699 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 689 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 758 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 568 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 794 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 643 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1321 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 665 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 745 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1255 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 576 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 680 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1352 Views

Reply to Message