Active Users:842 Time:22/12/2024 12:21:41 PM
We are not discussing concrete facts, so objective error is impossible Joel Send a noteboard - 26/02/2017 01:21:46 AM

Hence I could not say you were truly "wrong" about anything, despite strongly disagreeing on multiple significant points.

View original postAbout this in particular:
View original postWhy does every nation speak the same language but in its own unique accent? Please; Tolkien lampshaded that more than adequately with his conceit of "translating" ME "records" from the ancient "Red Book of Westmarch," whose "Westron" was "actually" closer to Old English or Norse than his modern English version. If anything, that was LESS excusable because he also "transliterated" the language of Rohan AS Old English.

Tolkien wrote such that the humans and hobbits in Western Middle Earth spoke a single language (which made sense since they all lived in the remnants of one kingdom). He also, however, created a dwarven language, two elven languages, a few words of orcish, made it clear the Ents had a language of their own, and also stated that other races of men spoke other languages that were not the same as the single language of the West. Not only that, but as a linguist he made it clear there had been many languages. Even attempting to compare Tolkien to Jordan is just insulting to Tolkien.

All true; I never said Jordan was such an obsessive and disciplined linguaphile that he INVENTED whole languages as a CHILD for FUN. I merely noted that even the Professor himself provided an simple plausible explanation for expressing a lingua franca expressed in English DESPITE the fact NONE of that worlds MANY languages were ACTUALLY English. One at least as plausible for a world with only a SINGLE speaking species (or 1½ if we count the few isolated and insular Ogier) that is geographically and culturally contiguous. Maybe the Seanchan and/or Seanchan could be expected to speak a distinct language incomprehensible to Westlands natives, but even they ultimately derived from the same ancestral and cultural stock. Their distinct languages would more likely be analogous to the distinct Indo-European languages than say, English vs. Martian or Quenya. Let me put it this way:

How many OTHER fantasy series do the EXACT SAME THING? The Wiki for ASoIaF quotes Jordans friend Martin himself thus:

Tolkien was a philologist, and an Oxford don, and could spend decades laboriously inventing Elvish in all its detail. I, alas, am only a hardworking SF and fantasy novel, and I don't have his gift for languages. That is to say, I have not actually created a Valyrian language. The best I could do was try to sketch in each of the chief tongues of my imaginary world in broad strokes, and give them each their characteristic sounds and spellings.

If that sounds a lot like what Jordan did with the Old Tongue, that is only because IT IS. Frankly, I think your far more justified criticism is of the Old Tongues existing wholly separate from Randlands modern language—despite all speakers of the latter descending from speakers of the former, to the point they lament the very thing that makes such a development unlikely: Their inability to read what their distant ancestors wrote. To illustrate just HOW unlikely such a phenomenon is, I did a quick and dirty Wikipedia search: Of 7472(!) known REAL languages, nearly 80% belong to one of just 14-15 root families. That is counting all the languages that developed and persisted in virtually total geographic isolation until the modern era, languages that only nominally exist at all (e.g. the Wikipedia states 42 Utian languages are spoken by 35 people, so either many of those three dozen people speak many languages, or many Ute languages are extinct) and languages long believed distinct that have since been proven or suspected to be linked (the Penutian root language believed to include the Utes is one such example.)

You are disappointed a mere 19 fictional nations, culturally and ancestrally linked, speak a single language when 200 frequently disparate actual nations barely speak a dozen? That is nitpicking, no more objective than condemning channeling itself as implausible. This is a FICTIONAL work of FANTASY; within that context, possibility is sufficient for plausibility. People sharing a common genetic, cultural and LINGUISTIC origin speaking the same language certainly qualifies (though, again, the notion they would all inexplicably develop a wholly NEW language than that they all ALREADY spoke is admittedly more dubious.)


View original post
View original postAs for character development, I cannot agree it is nonexistent. Many of the characters do fail to grow any more than superficially, but that lack of growth IS the fatal flaw, not in their characterization, but in their character itself: They are Greek tragic heroes, but that is no more an indictment of Jordan than of Aeschylus. Yet many major characters DO grow, a lot.

Again, comparing Jordan to Aeschylus is quite insulting. Aeschylus he was not. I wonder if you even understand the notion of Greek tragedy based on these asinine comments.

Wonder at will, but how commonly do otherwise laudable Greek heroes meet catastrophic ends because they fail to develop in some critical way?
View original post
View original postRand begins as a petty farmboy whose largest concern is evading chores, but his reaction to a greater destiny warps him into a defiant and then cold tyrant, then a final epiphany forges a firm but compassionately benevolent leader. At first he has no ambition beyond marrying his favorite village girl, then his goal is bitterly sacrificing himself for an ungrateful world, and at last he is eager both to save the world AND survive doing so before vanishing to avert that worlds permanent dependence on him (one alternate realities Rand witnesses while battling the DO surely includes his existence as God Emperor of Dune. )

I suppose he ages a couple of years, too, but that's not character growth. These so-called heroes are just cardboard cutouts of people.

The changes I referenced were all psychological, emotional and/or intellectual, not merely physical nor chronological. You made a false equivalence.
View original postAs for the pacing and story line, it was milking the money angle that killed it all. Exhibit 1 for the prosecution: that hideous piece of shit put out as a reference work to the Wheel of Shit Time.

I agree there was probably some element of milking, though I personally believe it was more ego than greed. However, that is not the SOLE reason the production of a DYING MAN slowed in his final days, and suggesting it was is far more "insulting" than anything I have ever said about Professor Tolkien. Further, TWoT needed a reference source if only to remove the sprawling narratives unreliable narrators (which, regrettably, the work in question deliberately refused to do.) It has a number of significant background details that would be difficult to insert into the narrative itself without a hamfisted exposition dump. The AoL and contemporary events are one thing, but how would a detailed account of Hawkwings rise and series of conquests come up in casual conversation?
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 26/02/2017 at 01:22:17 AM
Reply to message
How did you feel after completing AMoL? - - 24/02/2017 04:03:10 AM 1736 Views
Unsatisfied I suppose or perhaps regretful - 24/02/2017 02:54:12 PM 1180 Views
I'll post this again - 25/02/2017 01:29:16 AM 883 Views
Very good post, can't argue with it. - 25/02/2017 02:40:18 AM 1102 Views
I can argue with some of it - 25/02/2017 09:32:17 PM 1009 Views
You can say whatever you want, but you're wrong - 25/02/2017 10:40:58 PM 960 Views
We are not discussing concrete facts, so objective error is impossible - 26/02/2017 01:21:46 AM 1079 Views
In any discussion, error is possible. In your discussions, it's a near certainty. - 28/02/2017 08:24:59 PM 920 Views
On a different topic, how important do you think that stuff is? - 03/03/2017 07:20:15 AM 1033 Views
It's all about suspending disbelief, isn't it? - 04/03/2017 01:13:12 AM 1001 Views
That makes a lot of sense. - 08/03/2017 10:18:56 PM 995 Views
On further reflection, I think the religion element being left out is important. - 04/03/2017 04:07:53 AM 930 Views
Middle-Earth? - 08/03/2017 09:53:45 PM 1125 Views
A Elbereth Gilthoniel... - 10/03/2017 04:48:50 PM 950 Views
Personally, "religion" in WoT makes perfect sense... For the AoL. Not so much the Third Age - 09/03/2017 01:55:29 AM 1010 Views
But did they really undeniably prove this existence? - 09/03/2017 04:19:43 PM 1148 Views
Re: But did they really undeniably prove this existence? - 10/03/2017 07:47:11 AM 1106 Views
I think we are saying similar things - 12/03/2017 08:31:13 PM 1052 Views
Some points - 25/02/2017 11:54:50 PM 1004 Views
Well, some THINGS anyway. - 26/02/2017 01:56:29 AM 969 Views
Your recognition of irony is profound - 26/02/2017 08:39:47 AM 928 Views
mosty disappointment - 27/02/2017 10:15:29 PM 943 Views
Exhausted - 27/02/2017 10:52:51 PM 936 Views
Total agree about Moiraine's return..... - 28/02/2017 03:57:57 AM 955 Views
With Demandred... That was likely at least somewhat the point. - 28/02/2017 06:09:13 AM 890 Views
Not best pleased. - 27/02/2017 11:59:06 PM 876 Views
It felt like the end of Grease when the car flew off - 01/03/2017 02:22:19 AM 935 Views
Re: It felt like the end of Grease when the car flew off - 01/03/2017 08:39:23 AM 1054 Views
Re: It felt like the end of Grease when the car flew off - 01/03/2017 11:23:18 PM 1032 Views
Re: It felt like the end of Grease when the car flew off - 02/03/2017 06:07:12 AM 910 Views
I still haven't read it. - 01/03/2017 08:03:53 PM 889 Views
Interesting, any reason why you haven't read it yet? *NM* - 01/03/2017 10:26:21 PM 521 Views
It was the end of their world as I knew it, and I felt fine. *NM* - 02/03/2017 11:13:25 PM 568 Views
You were just happy that you-know-who died! *NM* - 03/03/2017 02:47:38 AM 561 Views
Disappointed, shocked, relieved. - 03/03/2017 04:44:56 PM 852 Views
Curious - what were you hoping to happen to Rand at the end? *NM* - 03/03/2017 09:00:12 PM 580 Views
Me too! - 04/03/2017 10:19:21 AM 807 Views
I cried and I was glad it was over! - 04/03/2017 09:13:03 PM 962 Views
there's just SO MUCH that could happen - 05/03/2017 09:33:26 AM 950 Views

Reply to Message