Active Users:685 Time:20/03/2026 05:51:05 PM
Oh well then I agree with you Sidious Send a noteboard - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM

Berowin directly says in her quote that her secret is practice. She's probably good with Spirit but she's clearly a woman who has spent decades playing with this weave and making it more efficient. It's possible that many different shields are possible. I don't think anyone, including the Forsaken, have taken the time to practice shielding to that degree but they do perhaps know of ways to weave stronger lattices that exceed Aes Sedai shields. We know from Elayne that practicing with Air made her very powerful with it, and Leane/Suian learned to work more efficiently with less saidar. Demandred said that he's had so much time to study war and dueling that no mortal man can match him, so there's a general theme of practice making perfect. It likely extends to the Power too.

Berowin probably found something new... A soft shield that bends. I suspect the standard weave is like a net made of rope and that perhaps some AOL individuals know how to weave shields made of metal wire. This is why Osan'gar says he can get around any shield.... The knot is where the flaw lies.

I think your theory is original and explains many shielding dilemmas in the series.

Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 3258 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1482 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1608 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1339 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1730 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1398 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1463 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1551 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1396 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1327 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1359 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1444 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1207 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1459 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1319 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1427 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1279 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1431 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1625 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1490 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1456 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1468 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1264 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1682 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 747 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1682 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1706 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1457 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1805 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1431 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1748 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1427 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1338 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1679 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1694 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1271 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1327 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1328 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1260 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1377 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1185 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1447 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 764 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 722 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1272 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1325 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1388 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1359 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1334 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1450 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1187 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1212 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1105 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1119 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1268 Views

Reply to Message