Active Users:667 Time:02/04/2025 05:23:14 AM
Some more quotes fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM

She was calm, cool, certain. Without thinking, he found himself reaching for saidin. He reached for it—and struck a wall he could not see or feel, except that it kept him from the Source.

Rand, after Lanfear shielded him in tSR.


She opened herself to saidar—and her stomach sank. Saidar was there—she could feel its warmth and light—but between her and the True Source stood something, nothing, an absence that shut her away from the Source like a stone wall.

Egwene, after Rand shields her in tSR.


He reached for the Source, battered at that invisible stone wall, harder, harder.

Once the Aes Sedai shield Rand.


Graendal formed two shields and slammed them into place, one for Aran’gar, one for Delana.

Graendal, using the exact same weave to hold both Delana and Aran'gar.


He reached for saidin—and found nothing. He had not been shielded; he would have felt it, and known how to work around or break it, given time, if it was not too strong.

Osan'gar, in LoC. Note that the strength of the shield is all he thinks matters.


She reached to embrace saidar, yet even as she did the glow surrounded the other woman, and Liandrin’s reach ran into a thick invisible wall shutting her away from the Source. It hung there like the sun, tantalizingly out of reach.

Liandrin, in LoC.

The weaves are walls, or stone walls, or thick walls, no matter who weaves them on men OR women.

Except:


Gathering herself, she strained to reach the Source, expecting the weaves to shatter. She would at least show these women she would not be. . . . The weaves . . . stretched. The round Cairhienin woman smiled, and Nynaeve’s face darkened. The shield stretched further, further, bulging like a ball. It would not break. That was impossible. Anyone could block her from the Source if they caught her by surprise, of course, and someone weaker could hold the shield once woven, but not this much weaker. And a shield did not bend that far without breaking. It was impossible!

Nynaeve has already been shielded by Moghedien at this point. Nothing about Berowin's shield is like Moggy's, or Nynaeve wouldn't have said a stretching shield is impossible.

This message last edited by fionwe1987 on 25/01/2016 at 05:14:11 PM
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2444 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1139 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1290 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 985 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1239 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1098 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1128 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1225 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1072 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 988 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1037 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1080 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 896 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1116 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1010 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1103 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 940 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1114 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1271 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1182 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1158 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1137 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 957 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1231 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 524 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1199 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1337 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1115 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1387 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1135 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1310 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1102 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1015 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1194 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1379 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 941 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 962 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1002 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 964 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1083 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 844 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1073 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 568 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 534 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 966 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 979 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1079 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1031 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 984 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1130 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 870 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 903 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 823 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 769 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 968 Views

Reply to Message