Active Users:667 Time:02/04/2025 05:23:01 AM
I always explained it as fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM

As for why opposite sex shielding was harder, I always saw it as a function of saidin and saidar repelling each other.

When you place a saidin shield on a woman, apart from the strength issue, the inherent repulsion of saidar to saidin makes it harder to place the saidin shiled in the path of flowing saidar.

Same is true in reverse.

I find your own explanation problematic. You're saying that the gentler flow of saidar makes it easier to dam up. So you're saying you need a flexible shield. But we know that saidar shields are generally not flexible. Elayne in tDR compares the BA shield on them to a wall. And Rand does the same to the AS shiled on him. Berowyn's is the only flexible shield we know of. Talaan's shield on Nyn is also not flexible at all.

There seems to be no evidence for your theory, or the hierarchy you put up.

Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2444 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1139 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1290 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 985 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1239 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1098 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1128 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1225 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1072 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 988 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1037 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1080 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 896 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1116 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1010 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1103 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 940 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1114 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1271 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1182 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1158 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1136 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 957 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1231 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 524 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1199 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1337 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1114 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1387 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1135 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1310 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1102 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1015 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1194 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1379 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 941 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 962 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1002 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 964 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1083 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 844 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1073 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 568 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 533 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 966 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 979 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1079 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1030 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 984 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1130 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 870 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 902 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 823 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 769 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 968 Views

Reply to Message