View original post
How can a fixed amount of Power be overdrawn upon?
How can a fixed amount of Power be overdrawn upon?
If an angreal offers 100 units of additive saidar how can someone draw 150 units through it?
The fixed amount is what the angreal adds. The overdrawing is all you. After all, you have no objection to that other fixed amount- a channeler's potential, being overdrawn upon, right?
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
2289 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1215 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
910 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1158 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1086 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1147 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1000 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
912 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
967 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1035 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
820 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1048 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
932 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1064 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
872 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1077 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1200 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1148 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1090 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1064 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
882 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1187 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1125 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1265 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1039 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1314 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1095 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1251 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1032 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
941 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
867 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
889 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
935 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
876 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1006 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
778 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
998 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way 
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
538 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
538 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
514 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
895 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
912 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1005 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
989 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
917 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1065 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
798 Views