Active Users:2330 Time:01/04/2026 08:02:20 PM
True gban007 Send a noteboard - 02/01/2016 05:39:12 AM

View original post
View original post
Just to put my 2 cents into the overall conversation on this thread

Do some of the issues we see with the power looking to change from the early books to later books revolve around Rand and Ishamael?

If so, is there potential that rather than the power changing, that Rand and Ishamael being the champions of light and shadow respectively, have a general innate strength, equivalent to others of 1++ strength, but that at times they become conduits of light / shadow, and so their apparent strength is even higher at those times?

I see this potentially supported by Rand's view of the forsaken in the first book, with the threads they had to the shadow and the differences between Aginor's and Ishamael's, and Rand's display against the shadow at Tarwin's Gap in the first book as well.



And let's not forget that Ishamael wasn't actually using the OP all of the time. He utilized the True Power most of the time and that seems to involve being as strong as the Dark One allows you to be rather than some innate strength level.


Moghedian's boost in strength at the end of the last battle is strong evidence of this I think.
Reply to message
One Power strength: let's play with numbers - 18/12/2015 01:09:06 PM 3099 Views
Actually, I largely agree - 18/12/2015 03:33:27 PM 1326 Views
Yup ... note how silent he's been since the Companion came out *NM* - 18/12/2015 05:50:44 PM 729 Views
I've been silent because the Companion is a joke and hardly worth pointing out all the errors... - 19/12/2015 09:37:53 AM 1377 Views
Clearly there are mistakes in the Companion - 19/12/2015 03:28:49 PM 1346 Views
- 19/12/2015 05:52:29 PM 1243 Views
It is easy to accept the Companion. All you have to do is reject the evidence in the books. - 19/12/2015 06:58:41 PM 1353 Views
No... - 19/12/2015 08:59:58 PM 1321 Views
And let's not forget Mylen - 21/12/2015 09:07:27 PM 1393 Views
Splitting flows: the Great Aes Sedai mixup - 22/12/2015 01:34:54 AM 1928 Views
Re: Splitting flows: the Great Aes Sedai mixup - 22/12/2015 06:05:02 AM 1539 Views
I have a theory on why - 23/12/2015 05:26:52 PM 1135 Views
Re: I have a theory on why - 24/12/2015 09:44:44 AM 1208 Views
How I see Traveling... - 24/12/2015 11:35:30 PM 1234 Views
Re: How I see Traveling... - 26/12/2015 10:43:13 AM 1245 Views
Re: How I see Traveling... - 29/12/2015 02:34:58 AM 1233 Views
Re: How I see Traveling... - 30/12/2015 07:41:43 AM 1441 Views
Re: How I see Traveling... - 01/01/2016 08:33:34 PM 1249 Views
Some thoughts - 20/12/2015 09:29:28 AM 1275 Views
My response to your thoughts... - 20/12/2015 07:19:15 PM 1407 Views
My thoughts on your thoughts - 21/12/2015 02:34:38 PM 1160 Views
Re: My thoughts on your thoughts - 21/12/2015 08:55:40 PM 1229 Views
Re: Some thoughts - 22/12/2015 06:21:41 PM 1419 Views
No palpitations here ... I pretty much agree with all of this *NM* - 18/12/2015 05:50:08 PM 693 Views
Well this is inconvenient - 19/12/2015 07:38:30 AM 1186 Views
hahaha - 19/12/2015 03:09:41 PM 1227 Views
Moraine and Siuan level in NS - 30/12/2015 02:13:05 AM 1195 Views
Here are my thoughts - 30/12/2015 06:29:02 AM 1220 Views
They were the same strength... - 30/12/2015 06:55:18 AM 1251 Views
Thanks - 30/12/2015 07:44:22 AM 1126 Views
Not really strange... - 30/12/2015 08:02:04 AM 1261 Views
Siuan was also a wilder, she was sent to TV when the spark manifested - 30/12/2015 03:50:17 PM 1223 Views
Not sure that works - 30/12/2015 07:17:27 AM 1277 Views
Part of this is also about an individual's personality - 30/12/2015 04:40:28 PM 1541 Views
Re: Part of this is also about an individual's personality - 30/12/2015 05:10:50 PM 1315 Views
Re: Part of this is also about an individual's personality - 30/12/2015 05:52:41 PM 1260 Views
Re: Part of this is also about an individual's personality - 30/12/2015 06:15:36 PM 1355 Views
Totally - 30/12/2015 06:46:14 PM 1345 Views
On Rand and Ishamael - 01/01/2016 09:20:35 PM 1179 Views
Re: On Rand and Ishamael - 02/01/2016 01:18:07 AM 1087 Views
True - 02/01/2016 05:39:12 AM 1268 Views
Re: True - 02/01/2016 07:52:33 PM 1172 Views
Re: True - 02/01/2016 10:56:39 PM 1219 Views
The more I look at this the more I think you are both right and wrong - 12/01/2016 09:02:57 PM 1286 Views

Reply to Message