Active Users:447 Time:04/04/2025 10:25:08 PM
However many ways they meant "dexterity," ALL are precluded by saying, "pure strength" Joel Send a noteboard - 02/07/2015 12:09:11 AM

View original post
View original postThen the quoted section basically says, "if comparing SOLELY strength, ignoring ALL else, the strongest man was as strong as the strongest woman." We know that is false because the male scale has levels above the female scales highest, and the rest of the entrys context consistently shows that comparison is not apples to oranges: Strength x is strength x, for male AND female, though a woman will have more skill than they would have as a man with all skills developed to the same degree.
The dexterity advantage is women only, and is inherent. The section is basically saying that if you ognore knowledge, practice, and other acquired characteristics, and stick to inherent stuff alone, the strongest man and strongest woman are the same.

Particularly when they make that explicit by clarifying that their statement is "avoiding the advantages of dexterity" etc. All that is sure is that WHATEVER they meant was very poorly expressed, because we must figure it out before we even CAN decide if we agree.

Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! - 24/06/2015 09:56:33 PM 2116 Views
Re: Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! - 25/06/2015 08:01:04 AM 1014 Views
Re: Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! - 25/06/2015 05:49:52 PM 1127 Views
That still would not make sense - 25/06/2015 09:22:48 PM 1100 Views
It would - 01/07/2015 07:17:09 PM 1129 Views
However many ways they meant "dexterity," ALL are precluded by saying, "pure strength" - 02/07/2015 12:09:11 AM 1177 Views
Re: That still would not make sense - 01/10/2015 11:54:06 PM 1199 Views
Re: Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! - 25/06/2015 05:23:32 PM 1318 Views
I suspect... - 25/06/2015 05:47:59 PM 1135 Views
Re: I suspect... - 25/06/2015 06:33:10 PM 1207 Views
Yeah, a comprehensive scale restricted to AS would not be comprehensive - 25/06/2015 09:22:36 PM 1118 Views
Re: Yeah, a comprehensive scale restricted to AS would not be comprehensive - 25/06/2015 09:56:22 PM 1074 Views
Sorilea can GRASP the Source reliably; there is no indication she can USE it - 27/06/2015 08:19:19 PM 1131 Views
Re: Sorilea can GRASP the Source reliably; there is no indication she can USE it - 29/06/2015 07:58:55 PM 1005 Views
Since she looks her age I suspect reaching it is almost entirely due to natural longevity - 29/06/2015 09:16:21 PM 975 Views
Not when you consider Morgase - 30/06/2015 09:02:35 PM 1029 Views
Sorilea has been at it far longer than Morgase - 02/07/2015 12:21:55 AM 1065 Views
Re: Sorilea has been at it far longer than Morgase - 08/07/2015 03:26:43 AM 1036 Views
Re: Sorilea has been at it far longer than Morgase - 09/07/2015 02:25:58 AM 1058 Views
RJ did say... - 09/07/2015 07:13:01 AM 963 Views
Morgase spent nearly 2 years in the Tower - 09/07/2015 03:22:06 PM 1299 Views
And countless hours of frustrated focus to--fleetingly--grasp the source ONCE (i.e. less than twice) - 10/07/2015 02:51:53 AM 1178 Views
doesn't make sense as you describe it - 10/07/2015 04:42:31 PM 942 Views
It does not make sense as Jordan describes it either - 10/07/2015 09:00:36 PM 1146 Views
I agree with all of this - 10/07/2015 05:21:40 PM 994 Views
You are wise - 10/07/2015 09:06:16 PM 1041 Views
66 levels for women + 6 ( ? ) for men - 27/06/2015 10:58:16 AM 1226 Views
This thing is all over the place - 30/06/2015 02:39:01 PM 1174 Views
Re: This thing is all over the place - 30/06/2015 09:39:43 PM 1112 Views
Some of it is... - 01/07/2015 08:10:00 PM 1242 Views

Reply to Message