Active Users:683 Time:23/12/2024 03:00:18 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 25/06/2015 05:49:52 PM

View original post
It is an interesting read, but I would like to see the actual rankings of characters

I think you're speculation is right, the only comment I have is that the end passage of the text seems to be contradicted by the following passage, which in of itself doesn't quite make sense so is likely incorrect, and whether the no shouldn't be in there, so that the dexterity does make them a match:

"Still, one-on-one, looking only at pure strength and avoiding the advantages of dexterity, length of practice and skill, the top level for a man was usually no more than a match for the top level for a woman"


I suspect they are using dexterity two ways here. There's the dexterity that comes with experience, which men can also gain, and there's the inherent dexterity advantage women have. In the passage above, they're talking about acquired dexterity, so if you remove all that, the top woman and top man are pretty much the same, which lines up with what RJ said before.

I do wish they'd been clearer on this, though.

Reply to message
Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! fionwe1987 - 24/06/2015 09:56:33 PM 2041 Views
Re: Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! gban007 - 25/06/2015 08:01:04 AM 942 Views
Re: Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! fionwe1987 - 25/06/2015 05:49:52 PM 1052 Views
That still would not make sense Joel - 25/06/2015 09:22:48 PM 1029 Views
It would fionwe1987 - 01/07/2015 07:17:09 PM 1060 Views
However many ways they meant "dexterity," ALL are precluded by saying, "pure strength" Joel - 02/07/2015 12:09:11 AM 1102 Views
Re: That still would not make sense Onarishma - 01/10/2015 11:54:06 PM 1116 Views
Re: Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! darius_sedai - 25/06/2015 05:23:32 PM 1234 Views
I suspect... fionwe1987 - 25/06/2015 05:47:59 PM 1058 Views
Re: I suspect... darius_sedai - 25/06/2015 06:33:10 PM 1123 Views
Yeah, a comprehensive scale restricted to AS would not be comprehensive Joel - 25/06/2015 09:22:36 PM 1038 Views
Re: Yeah, a comprehensive scale restricted to AS would not be comprehensive darius_sedai - 25/06/2015 09:56:22 PM 994 Views
Sorilea can GRASP the Source reliably; there is no indication she can USE it Joel - 27/06/2015 08:19:19 PM 1040 Views
Re: Sorilea can GRASP the Source reliably; there is no indication she can USE it darius_sedai - 29/06/2015 07:58:55 PM 927 Views
Since she looks her age I suspect reaching it is almost entirely due to natural longevity Joel - 29/06/2015 09:16:21 PM 898 Views
Not when you consider Morgase darius_sedai - 30/06/2015 09:02:35 PM 981 Views
Morghase did use her ability to effect, when unencumbered by Tower nonsense fionwe1987 - 01/07/2015 07:22:47 PM 1266 Views
Re: Morghase did use her ability to effect, when unencumbered by Tower nonsense darius_sedai - 01/07/2015 10:32:13 PM 1052 Views
Sorilea has been at it far longer than Morgase Joel - 02/07/2015 12:21:55 AM 986 Views
Re: Sorilea has been at it far longer than Morgase darius_sedai - 08/07/2015 03:26:43 AM 950 Views
Re: Sorilea has been at it far longer than Morgase Joel - 09/07/2015 02:25:58 AM 970 Views
RJ did say... fionwe1987 - 09/07/2015 07:13:01 AM 896 Views
True, but that only makes slowings imprecise nature harder to gauge Joel - 10/07/2015 02:51:45 AM 1296 Views
Morgase spent nearly 2 years in the Tower darius_sedai - 09/07/2015 03:22:06 PM 1202 Views
And countless hours of frustrated focus to--fleetingly--grasp the source ONCE (i.e. less than twice) Joel - 10/07/2015 02:51:53 AM 1064 Views
doesn't make sense as you describe it darius_sedai - 10/07/2015 04:42:31 PM 863 Views
It does not make sense as Jordan describes it either Joel - 10/07/2015 09:00:36 PM 1068 Views
I agree with all of this fionwe1987 - 10/07/2015 05:21:40 PM 945 Views
You are wise Joel - 10/07/2015 09:06:16 PM 963 Views
But the scale was only applicable for Aes Sedai; they are the only ones to whom strength matters Cannoli - 25/06/2015 11:10:45 PM 970 Views
It MATTERS to everyone; just because it is irrelevant to a hierarchy does not make it absolutely so Joel - 27/06/2015 08:44:07 PM 943 Views
The problem with that fionwe1987 - 01/07/2015 07:26:53 PM 1180 Views
66 levels for women + 6 ( ? ) for men Terez - 27/06/2015 10:58:16 AM 1151 Views
theory, lesser strength increases the likely hood of a very specific sometimes untapped talent? Aleksis Michael - 30/06/2015 12:25:45 AM 950 Views
Developed skills are distinct from innate Talents (in Randland, literally) but I would still say no Joel - 30/06/2015 01:21:25 PM 863 Views
This thing is all over the place Shannow - 30/06/2015 02:39:01 PM 1097 Views
Re: This thing is all over the place darius_sedai - 30/06/2015 09:39:43 PM 1022 Views
Some of it is... fionwe1987 - 01/07/2015 08:10:00 PM 1156 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes