Active Users:1568 Time:18/01/2025 10:30:19 AM
The very notion that any of the series was important enough to discuss this is absurd. Tom Send a noteboard - 29/01/2014 09:50:06 PM

Sanderson's works have every right to stand alongside the other books. It's clear that the first book he wrote was easily better than four or five of the Jordan books, and the other two were still better than at least three of them.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 1630 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 1003 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 428 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 464 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 436 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 436 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1154 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1067 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 565 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 822 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 967 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 947 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 810 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 880 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 1005 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 448 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 463 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 506 Views
The very notion that any of the series was important enough to discuss this is absurd. - 29/01/2014 09:50:06 PM 895 Views

Reply to Message