Active Users:871 Time:15/11/2024 06:09:39 AM
+1 *NM* Lo'oris Send a noteboard - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM
--
Io iudico bene questo: che sia meglio essere impetuoso che respettivo, perché la fortuna è donna ed è necessario, volendola tenere sotto, batterla e urtarla.
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 1602 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 974 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 414 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 454 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 422 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 422 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1125 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1043 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 553 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 794 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 933 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 918 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 781 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 846 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 973 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 433 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 450 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 493 Views

Reply to Message