Active Users:348 Time:25/04/2025 10:03:52 PM
+1 *NM* Lo'oris Send a noteboard - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM
--
Io iudico bene questo: che sia meglio essere impetuoso che respettivo, perché la fortuna è donna ed è necessario, volendola tenere sotto, batterla e urtarla.
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 1692 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 1073 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 464 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 493 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 465 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 470 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1223 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1134 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 598 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 881 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 1017 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 1010 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 864 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 932 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 1065 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 470 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 489 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 530 Views

Reply to Message