Active Users:1641 Time:18/01/2025 10:20:49 AM
Why does anybody care? Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM

I ignore things I don't like from canon all the time. It'd only be relevant if we were expecting some kind of sequel and wanted to make sure that material wasn't included, but given that this is a completed work, it doesn't change anything to anything.

The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 1630 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 1003 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 428 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 464 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 435 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 436 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1154 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1067 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 564 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 822 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 967 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 946 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 809 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 879 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 1005 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 447 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 463 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 506 Views

Reply to Message