Active Users:2166 Time:19/01/2025 08:25:00 AM
Some proof against your idea... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 01/10/2009 03:37:48 AM
I think one scene from KoD kind of disproves what you are suggesting. Nynaeve notices mixed links that are channeling giant balls of fire to burn Trollocs. She states that the intensity of the flames was too high for it to be from saidar (that she can see) alone. The implication is that saidin was used as well.

Now, if what you say is true, Nynaeve would not have said "saidar alone". Why imply the presence of another power if the link can enhance saidar? Why not say "unenhanced saidar"?

I agree with you on one thing, though. While each channeler in a link will be channeling a small amount of the Power at least, the leader can make them use different amounts, and not use any of their power at all if they so choose.
Reply to message
Male/Female circles - 25/09/2009 09:33:38 PM 866 Views
Yes; somewhat. - 25/09/2009 10:57:35 PM 552 Views
Re: Yes; somewhat. - 26/09/2009 06:19:45 AM 485 Views
Why would saidar surprise him? - 26/09/2009 03:40:23 PM 529 Views
Re: Why would saidar surprise him? - 26/09/2009 06:34:04 PM 497 Views
He thought they were Aes Sedai who could not channel? - 26/09/2009 07:02:42 PM 438 Views
He did not know they were Aes Sedai until after the mixed weave struck his warding. - 26/09/2009 10:13:10 PM 435 Views
You're right. I misremembered. *NM* - 26/09/2009 10:17:22 PM 204 Views
right... - 26/09/2009 02:56:26 PM 497 Views
Re: right... - 26/09/2009 07:49:21 PM 477 Views
I think Lanfear clears this up... - 27/09/2009 05:19:37 AM 510 Views
But he did see the weaves - 29/09/2009 03:38:10 PM 452 Views
Agreed, plus some numbers ... - 28/09/2009 07:50:54 PM 455 Views
I don't agree with some of this - 28/09/2009 09:37:13 PM 455 Views
Re: I don't agree with some of this - 29/09/2009 02:39:46 PM 491 Views
Re: I don't agree with some of this - 29/09/2009 06:07:56 PM 419 Views
Re: I don't agree with some of this - 29/09/2009 07:00:28 PM 457 Views
Re: I don't agree with some of this - 29/09/2009 08:25:19 PM 524 Views
I understand what you're saying ... - 30/09/2009 04:04:17 PM 450 Views
Indeed - 30/09/2009 04:32:37 PM 403 Views
Re: Indeed - 30/09/2009 07:05:13 PM 484 Views
Some proof against your idea... - 01/10/2009 03:37:48 AM 453 Views
Nice, thanks ... - 01/10/2009 02:00:24 PM 421 Views
Re: Nice, thanks ... - 01/10/2009 04:58:02 PM 469 Views
That makes more sense, to me ... - 01/10/2009 06:44:44 PM 513 Views
Re: That makes more sense, to me ... - 03/10/2009 06:53:45 AM 521 Views
Re: Male/Female circles - 27/09/2009 02:19:31 PM 458 Views
Re: Male/Female circles - 28/09/2009 03:58:15 PM 454 Views

Reply to Message