Active Users:393 Time:02/04/2025 03:23:28 AM
Re: IMO... Corwin Send a noteboard - 30/09/2009 09:51:30 PM
Rand will fake his death before TG (probably at the beginning of AmoL, after the great reunion) to deceive the Shadow and operate more freely against it. Several other Prophecies indicate this as well, e.g. Logain stepping over a paper puppet of Rand. Therefore I think the expression "he who is dead yet lives" doesn't necessarily have to point to a time after TG.


You seem to be resting your assessment of the Nicola foretelling on your theory that Rand will fake his own death. I think there is a great deal more evidence pointing to Rand dying a literal death during TG and being reborn in some manner afterward. Your evidence for Rand faking his own death, such as the prophecy of Logain stepping over a paper puppet of Rand, could be interpreted as Logain stepping over a fake Rand (such as Taim posing as Rand), or even just Logain succeeding Rand following TG (in which case this prophecy could be interpreted as you did, where Rand is not really dead, but taking place after TG and not before).

Also, there are some flaws in the logic of what you are suggesting. Assuming the events of the Nicola foretelling happen chronologically, it appears that Rand faking his own death (by your interpretation) occurs prior to "the great battle," which you have suggested to be the Seanchan attack on the WT - but you also state that you think Rand will fake his death sometime in the beginning of AMoL. Now, considering we have very strong indications that the Seanchan attack on the WT will happen in TGS, there seem to be some issues with time line in your interpretation. Also, we can assume that Rand's truce with the Seanchan will come at some point before AMoL, most likely in TGS, but the foretelling states that "the land [is still] divided by the return," which would be before the time when you believe Rand will fake his death, again raising issues with the chronological sequence of the foretelling.

And, apart from all that, why would a battle that will be small meat compared to TG be referred to as "the great battle?" Sure, this will be an important battle, but it is doubtful it will be any larger than Dumai's Wells, and while it may be relevant to the future of the Aes Sedai, Dumai's Wells was clearly more important to the future of the world.
Reply to message
Dark Phrophecy would really like Sidious' input - 30/09/2009 03:18:21 PM 1002 Views
Yes - 30/09/2009 03:34:05 PM 739 Views
Wasn't it The Great Battle done? *NM* - 30/09/2009 04:28:54 PM 226 Views
Yes... - 30/09/2009 04:42:09 PM 685 Views
But... - 30/09/2009 05:01:17 PM 649 Views
As I understand it... - 30/09/2009 05:24:00 PM 664 Views
I agree with fionwe1987. IMO that was a reference to Fel & Rand's discussion earlier about TG. - 01/10/2009 05:21:16 AM 631 Views
There also is another Dream... - 01/10/2009 04:07:29 PM 555 Views
Was that cited as a Dream, or one of those she thinks are just nightmares? Because it can't happen. - 02/10/2009 01:38:47 AM 561 Views
Not necessarily, but... - 02/10/2009 07:12:09 AM 547 Views
Well... - 02/10/2009 03:31:21 PM 685 Views
I disagree - 30/09/2009 05:58:24 PM 738 Views
I agree with Corwin. - 30/09/2009 06:15:07 PM 606 Views
Well... - 30/09/2009 06:41:04 PM 705 Views
Re: Well... - 30/09/2009 07:19:59 PM 776 Views
IMO... - 30/09/2009 07:47:23 PM 624 Views
Re: IMO... - 30/09/2009 08:27:02 PM 605 Views
Re: IMO... - 30/09/2009 09:51:30 PM 780 Views
Re: IMO... - 01/10/2009 04:37:30 PM 610 Views
Re: Well... - 30/09/2009 09:15:49 PM 636 Views
But - 01/10/2009 04:19:42 PM 741 Views
What Etzel says - 30/09/2009 04:18:56 PM 649 Views
Now the future does teeter on the edge of a blade! *NM* - 01/10/2009 05:24:22 AM 224 Views
Interesting thought *spoiler for TGS, ch.1* - 01/10/2009 05:00:58 PM 582 Views

Reply to Message