Active Users:1064 Time:22/11/2024 06:54:02 AM
Its true, but RJ should get some blame Sidious Send a noteboard - 05/02/2013 03:56:20 PM

Most people think that the series went into a nosedive after book 7, and it's probably true. The pace was abysmal compared to the previous books.

I felt that a lot of the plots were drawn out unnecessarily. I am a "visceral Perrin hater" so perhaps its unfair, but it really did seem like the most unbelievably infinite quest to find Faile, with lots of meaningless rants, and equally loathsome Faile PoV's to mirror it. Add to that the soul-destroying quest to gain the Lion Throne (Elayne 'cleverly' dealing with belligerent nobility set against the backdrop of the imminent end of the world) and the endless quest for Egwene to become Amyrlin (Salidar seemed to move at Shayol Ghul time speed), and you've got a lot of wasted pages. I personally recall my disbelief at the end of each book that the Tower was not united yet again.

And I'm not going to mention CoT too much. I've always said its a disgrace that we were subjected to that. The idea of subjecting us to, among others,retrospective PoV's of the Cleansing, was just the ultimate low point of the series.

So yeah, Brandon screwed it up, but so did RJ. Don't believe me? Go look at people's expectations prior to each book and see how their expectations carried forward as each new book came out. The blurbs of each book were often wrong in their own content i.e. Egwene al'Vere must hurry to unite the Tower etc. The latter half of the series assumed an irresponsible, glacial pace that forced the original writer himself to say that come hell or high water, he'll finish with AMOL no matter what. It seems even he lost control of the series.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
So, am I the only one who kind of liked the whole Androl/Pevara plot? - 31/01/2013 02:30:15 PM 2248 Views
It was extremely irritating... - 31/01/2013 02:34:32 PM 1290 Views
Re: It was extremely irritating... - 31/01/2013 02:47:46 PM 1414 Views
It felt like a plot tacked on as a vanity by Sanderson - 31/01/2013 02:49:09 PM 1069 Views
Indeed... - 31/01/2013 02:58:50 PM 1100 Views
Re: Indeed... - 31/01/2013 03:05:44 PM 1206 Views
I kind of always thought RJ intended the minor characters to be bland - 03/02/2013 12:00:33 AM 919 Views
I'd say more like Mistborn than Harry Potter *NM* - 01/02/2013 02:53:30 PM 489 Views
No I loved it too. *NM* - 31/01/2013 02:43:31 PM 468 Views
I liked it. Most of the whining about is hilarious. - 31/01/2013 03:01:10 PM 1056 Views
I hated it because it reeked of sanderson pandering to "internet humour" for lack of a better term. - 31/01/2013 04:47:54 PM 1007 Views
Yep. I know what you mean, though it's hard to exactly quantify. - 31/01/2013 04:49:12 PM 970 Views
I could really use an example here - 01/02/2013 02:56:50 PM 953 Views
I enjoyed it - 31/01/2013 04:37:42 PM 841 Views
It was a fairly bad execution of some good ideas - 31/01/2013 05:01:59 PM 1459 Views
He probably didn't have enough time to learn the characters completely - 01/02/2013 01:45:11 PM 1017 Views
Re: He probably didn't have enough time to learn the characters completely - 02/02/2013 04:48:45 PM 1166 Views
Well said... I would have waited for a better end product *NM* - 02/02/2013 05:50:16 PM 469 Views
I 100% agree with everything you said here! *NM* - 01/02/2013 02:16:56 PM 456 Views
Pretty much. But I think significant blame should be laid at Jordan's feet for his abysmal pacing. - 02/02/2013 10:48:06 AM 1027 Views
Yeah, yeah.. it's the f*cking silk washing's scene's fault - 02/02/2013 05:59:30 PM 1300 Views
Damn you are on a roll ... Nicely said. *NM* - 03/02/2013 12:46:57 AM 556 Views
Its true, but RJ should get some blame - 05/02/2013 03:56:20 PM 1017 Views
i enjoyed this subplot - 05/02/2013 05:41:23 PM 1282 Views
Not the only one..I really enjoyed reading their story. *NM* - 01/02/2013 02:05:21 PM 541 Views
It was my favourite subplot *NM* - 01/02/2013 02:17:26 PM 728 Views
I really liked this plot-line! *NM* - 03/02/2013 07:23:48 AM 451 Views
I liked it, but that's because... - 10/02/2013 09:14:44 AM 1096 Views

Reply to Message