Active Users:1163 Time:22/11/2024 11:42:12 PM
As to that... Shannow Send a noteboard - 31/01/2013 02:55:14 PM
Which in your case is self evident.


I've been reading this series faithfully for 22 years starting with the paperback release of EotW. Judging by your tone and vocabulary, that was before you were born. I've had plenty of years between volumes to re-read, re-analyze, and theorize. If you mean that I haven't immersed myself neck deep in the online fandom, well, no, I haven't. If anything I think that makes my analysis more relevant, not less.

As many have said. To the casual reader, Sanderson would have satisfied their curiousity as to how the plot ends.


Sure, lots of casual readers don't complain about how he's ruined Mat's character from a consistency point of view. They don't complain about all the fan service in AMoL. They miss a lot of things. It doesn't seem to bother them that AMoL reads a majority of the time like a Civil War re-enactment plan instead of a character driven fantasy story, which I can't help but think RJ would not have done. Still...

To the reader who has dedicated more time and effort into the theory and systems behind it all, it leaves a lot to be desired.


I'm fully able to recognize the dramatic shift in tone and style in the last few volumes. I generally suspect that I can tell when I'm reading RJ and when I'm reading Brandon, and when I'm reading an RJ-Brandon hybrid.

Despite that, because I'm not an autist, I can also recognize that this is a work of fiction, that RJ is dead, that RJ said himself that there were red herrings and twists coming up, and I can give Brandon the benefit of the doubt regarding at least some of his changes in that RJ might have been planning similar twists and rule changes for the End of the World. Even if the story was "hijacked" into a completely different story and plan, I can accept that this is the official canon and I have sufficient imagination (even though I honestly don't think much is required) to weld the two and come out with a satisfying continuity.

Again, because I'm not autistic and this is a fantasy story about wizards and orcs, not an historical record that needs the pedantic and unforgiving attention of a monk/clerk with a personality to match.


Well done with regard to all of that.

By your own admission, however, the internal consistency of the One Power system in the transition from RJ to Brandon's writing is not particularly important to you.

Hence, it is self evident that you would not be bothered by Brandon's mistakes.


Reply to message
The One Power: Sanderson's serious lack of understanding of the concept... - 31/01/2013 08:57:24 AM 1593 Views
Dont get me started - 31/01/2013 11:46:41 AM 977 Views
Re: The One Power: Sanderson's serious lack of understanding of the concept... - 31/01/2013 01:28:07 PM 927 Views
That is utterly incorrect. Rand's case is an evolutionary next step which doesn't apply in general.. - 31/01/2013 01:42:09 PM 854 Views
Sorry, but it's not utterly incorrect. You can no more disprove it than I can prove it - 31/01/2013 01:49:11 PM 903 Views
Channelers physically burn out when they exceed their limits. That's the proof. - 31/01/2013 01:52:50 PM 682 Views
Re: Channelers physically burn out when they exceed their limits. That's the proof. - 31/01/2013 01:58:17 PM 778 Views
Sorry. But that is simply an escape clause for Sanderson to change whatever rules he wants... - 31/01/2013 01:59:29 PM 785 Views
Re: Sorry. But that is simply an escape clause for Sanderson to change whatever rules he wants... - 31/01/2013 02:11:26 PM 793 Views
No, he did a crap job - 31/01/2013 02:19:18 PM 704 Views
Re: No, he did a crap job - 31/01/2013 02:20:33 PM 635 Views
Your level of satisfaction will inversely correlate to your depth of understanding of the nuances... - 31/01/2013 02:24:09 PM 658 Views
LMAO - 31/01/2013 02:46:11 PM 719 Views
As to that... - 31/01/2013 02:55:14 PM 739 Views
Also the number of times Forsaken level channelers flung protagonists around with "Air weaves"... - 31/01/2013 02:18:05 PM 835 Views
Sure, but - 31/01/2013 02:19:46 PM 760 Views
Oh don't get me started on "Air weaves"...(1,2,3, and "start" ) - 01/02/2013 12:02:48 AM 908 Views
I'm not so sure.. - 01/02/2013 12:30:57 AM 878 Views
Re: The One Power: Sanderson's serious lack of understanding of the concept... - 05/02/2013 02:54:58 PM 788 Views

Reply to Message