Active Users:398 Time:05/11/2024 11:18:56 PM
Yeah, his writing annoys me greatly at times Larry Send a noteboard - 24/01/2013 06:57:50 PM
Long time, no see!

Yeah, the book was very underwhelming (I actually think it is one of the poorest in the series in terms of prose and plot execution)

It's fairly rare English prose bothers me - even in pop lit. like this, but Brandon's really bad enough to be seriously distracting. The more his novels became complex and big, the more it stands out as a weakness.


Agreed. It isn't as "clear" as the best juvenile/YA fiction nor is it able to demonstrate a mastery of complex clauses. It feels like a barely-expanded screenplay more than anything else. Actually, that's too harsh on screenplays, as the better ones convey even without the actor emoting a greater clarity than many of Sanderson's scenes in his novels.

English is the most basic tool of his trade, he should really invest some time to hone his skills. His editors who let it slide are no better. It's getting more and more annoying to see him brush it off as unimportant every time someone mentions this. He hides behind this notion his prose is "invisible". He should realize it's bad enough it's anything but invisible. Not much of the craftsman's pride there, I guess.


I remember years ago on Westeros where he and I got into a discussion on that issue (sadly, the thread was deleted for space reasons a couple of years later). I did see some improvement in his Mistborn novels, but lately it's been worse in effort and quality.

It's so frustrating, because if he would put better effort into developing appropriate styles for the stories he writes, his fiction could go from "flawed execution of potentially good ideas" to something worth reading more than once. The Emperor's Soul I think is his best story conception, but even it falters due to the inattention to prose nuances. Frustrating.

The book was full of semantic mistakes. He often gives words a meaning no dictionary recognizes, is sometimes completely way off (using favours in the sense of smells in TGS), transforms nouns into verbs (like deciding that "to game" is an acceptable synonym of "to play";), makes full of syntax errors, full of jarring anachronisms (a sandpaper metaphor, medical terms, precise geologic vocabulary given to farmers etc.). His use of pronouns is distracting to the point of annoyance - half the time he uses a pronoun when the context calls for the character's name and the other way around. We often get the pronoun first and later the name in the sentence, eg: "She believed Egwene should do better", in an Egwene POV! In general, he uses names instead of pronouns way too much in POVs for a 3PL context - RJ could go pages without using the name of the POV character after its first mention in a scene.


Yes, it was jarring. Now I don't think of RJ as a master prose stylist, but at least his writing was consistent in terms of the effect he aimed to achieve. Trying to emulate even part of that didn't help Sanderson any, I'll grant. It read like Amateur Hour at times.

It's stunning Tor lets stuff like this be published when a simple language polishing pass by a professional reviser would solve this (though the way Brandon himself speaks of his writing, his raw stuff before editing is much worse than this. I guess the editors correct the worst of his grammar and spelling and just give up at some point). They really have lowered their standards. I guess it's worrying that so many younger readers find Brandon's English "just fine".


Well, it reads much like contemporary American English in its social registers and use of verbs as nouns and vice versa. Doesn't make it good, but it does seem to appeal to those who speak in a similar fashion.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Where to begin.... - 23/01/2013 05:22:12 AM 5153 Views
I agree. It wasn' a bad book so much as a weak ending - 23/01/2013 05:33:51 AM 1472 Views
Re: Where to begin.... - 23/01/2013 08:26:58 AM 1499 Views
Good to see you still around - 25/01/2013 06:07:55 AM 1406 Views
Re: Where to begin.... - 23/01/2013 01:18:31 PM 1460 Views
Re: Where to begin.... - 23/01/2013 04:11:13 PM 2756 Views
Agreed - 24/01/2013 01:24:52 AM 1452 Views
Brandon was just following Jordan's example in this - 24/01/2013 02:49:44 PM 1549 Views
Not quite - 24/01/2013 04:47:00 PM 1488 Views
Hi Dominic! - 25/01/2013 12:23:05 AM 1567 Views
Eh! - 25/01/2013 04:01:27 AM 1660 Views
Logain was in Merrilor?? - 25/01/2013 07:31:19 AM 1373 Views
And what about the Kin ? - 24/01/2013 03:18:28 PM 1445 Views
Most of the Kin didn't came to Andor with Elayne and Nynaeve - 24/01/2013 03:40:47 PM 1271 Views
Hey John - 24/01/2013 04:04:39 PM 1885 Views
Re: Hey John - 24/01/2013 05:45:30 PM 1922 Views
Yeah, his writing annoys me greatly at times - 24/01/2013 06:57:50 PM 2048 Views
Re: Yeah, his writing annoys me greatly at times - 25/01/2013 04:55:54 AM 1312 Views
I'm as much of a "mainstream" reviewer as a fantasy one these days, so... - 25/01/2013 05:16:16 AM 1689 Views
Re: I'm as much of a "mainstream" reviewer as a fantasy one these days, so... - 25/01/2013 08:37:48 PM 2100 Views
Totally agree about Mat - 27/01/2013 08:01:50 PM 1311 Views
Re: Totally agree about Mat - 27/01/2013 10:19:55 PM 2090 Views
Re: Yeah, his writing annoys me greatly at times - 10/02/2013 08:10:35 AM 1354 Views
At one point he used the word "arabesque" - how can something be that without Arabic culture? *NM* - 24/01/2013 09:25:54 PM 996 Views
Indeed... - 25/01/2013 03:14:22 AM 1457 Views
What about misuse of titles? - 25/01/2013 06:19:16 AM 1248 Views
I was thinking of that this morning... - 25/01/2013 09:36:48 PM 1336 Views
You still Trolling the WoTBoards Larry? - 24/01/2013 11:06:14 PM 1308 Views
Ha! I've mellowed a bit, though! - 25/01/2013 04:56:47 AM 1865 Views
Been there - 26/01/2013 09:27:10 PM 1210 Views
Hello - 25/01/2013 06:21:04 AM 1188 Views
Back at you, Mark - 25/01/2013 07:46:12 AM 1239 Views
Were you the one who came up with "Selene was Mesaana"? - 25/01/2013 07:44:01 AM 1556 Views
Yep. That was me - 25/01/2013 08:26:37 AM 1384 Views
Re: Yep. That was me - 25/01/2013 08:54:46 AM 1298 Views

Reply to Message