Active Users:1053 Time:22/11/2024 07:11:42 AM
Nothing she said indicated that; she only objected to throwaway characters for the sake of gayness. Joel Send a noteboard - 14/01/2013 06:01:36 PM
Pitiable, yes, but hilarious. Welcome to the 21st century. I advise you get used to it.

And of course, there's the fact that showing gay men establishes quite clearly that homosexuality in both sexes is a recognized phenomenon in the Westlands.

It reeked of tokenism, man. "Oh, btw, we have never seen the Kandori queens foremost general before, but he will not marry her, because he prefers guys." Same with the two unturned Asha'man traveling with Pevar and Androl: "Btw, only Jonneth will be bonded, because Emarin prefers guys." Um... OK... why are you telling me this? Which of us is fixated on homosexuality again? There is no strong personal bond or long personal history between two characters to explain with a homosexual relationship, no jilted former lover resenting a past paramour or infiltration by seduction, just "LOOK, LOOK, GRATUITOUS GAY DUDE111" So? Who cares? I thought the whole point was that sexuality is irrelevant to anyone but sex partners?
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Pillow friends - 10/01/2013 12:43:22 PM 1758 Views
Re: Pillow friends - 10/01/2013 03:32:21 PM 1029 Views
Re: Pillow friends - 10/01/2013 03:34:43 PM 998 Views
Re: Pillow friends - 10/01/2013 06:41:01 PM 1001 Views
Political correctness, at its best. - 10/01/2013 04:41:08 PM 1264 Views
Re: Political correctness, at its best. - 10/01/2013 04:59:42 PM 1012 Views
That you're offended at gay people for having the temerity to exist is hilarious. - 13/01/2013 12:15:48 PM 972 Views
Nothing she said indicated that; she only objected to throwaway characters for the sake of gayness. - 14/01/2013 06:01:36 PM 845 Views
Just like the Sea Folk having dark skin is tokenism. *NM* - 15/01/2013 07:33:15 AM 421 Views
And the Sharans, and much of the Seanchan. - 15/01/2013 08:07:13 AM 903 Views
That you jump to the conclusion that I'm offended by gay characters is both laugable and sad... - 14/01/2013 06:06:30 PM 860 Views
I started the thread..... - 15/01/2013 08:57:58 PM 823 Views
I'm gay and I found it offensive and ignorant. - 17/01/2013 05:47:58 PM 785 Views
You're reaction does come across as knee-jerk. *NM* - 15/01/2013 09:12:03 PM 390 Views
overreact much? - 19/01/2013 09:55:06 PM 848 Views
i was disappointed that it wasnt anyone remotely close to having a POV - 13/01/2013 01:33:02 AM 893 Views
Narishma would've been perfect, and would've made sense... - 14/01/2013 06:50:32 PM 844 Views
Why would Narishma be a good gay character? - 14/01/2013 08:18:35 PM 963 Views
Re: Why would Narishma be a good gay character? - 14/01/2013 09:37:27 PM 925 Views
Weren't Siuan and Moiriane lovers? - 15/01/2013 07:35:16 AM 828 Views
Re: Weren't Siuan and Moiriane lovers? - 15/01/2013 05:38:56 PM 904 Views
Re: Weren't Siuan and Moiriane lovers? - 15/01/2013 09:05:55 PM 913 Views

Reply to Message