Fram kamerater!
This message last edited by Tor on 23/11/2012 at 03:03:40 PM
How many standard deviations is Lanfear
15/11/2012 06:04:39 PM
- 2074 Views
Hmm...
15/11/2012 07:25:34 PM
- 1212 Views
see we CAN agree on stuff
15/11/2012 07:56:12 PM
- 1064 Views
18/11/2012 08:37:22 PM
- 958 Views
Re:
18/11/2012 11:07:17 PM
- 1163 Views
Re:
19/11/2012 05:16:00 AM
- 991 Views
Re:
19/11/2012 03:13:01 PM
- 996 Views
They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 03:19:19 PM
- 1000 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 04:01:43 PM
- 1204 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 09:04:04 PM
- 950 Views
Hmmm...
20/11/2012 02:08:40 AM
- 1017 Views
Perhaps, but Egwene is also being a bit dramatic in the scene as she managed
20/11/2012 04:28:57 AM
- 975 Views
Nope...
20/11/2012 03:13:13 PM
- 1025 Views
I believe she is being over dramatic
20/11/2012 03:26:24 PM
- 925 Views
Keep believing that...
20/11/2012 03:30:14 PM
- 1054 Views
*shrugs*
20/11/2012 03:49:10 PM
- 1004 Views
Tired and forkroot are the same now?
20/11/2012 03:55:22 PM
- 910 Views
No it's the literary device
20/11/2012 04:04:28 PM
- 1030 Views
Impossible. Daigian is exactly 0.32SD below the mean
19/11/2012 11:06:04 AM
- 974 Views
You keep saying that, but it is either a linear or a non-linear distribution
19/11/2012 09:09:32 PM
- 1030 Views
That's the whole point. Thanks for finally seeing it.
19/11/2012 09:43:27 PM
- 993 Views
keep believing that ... but you making up numbers isn't really relevant *NM*
20/11/2012 04:29:44 AM
- 654 Views
Please show me a number that is made up. The 0.32SD for Daigian is a rule of statistics.
20/11/2012 07:15:48 AM
- 955 Views
Ugh. I hate power level discussions. For real world applications, it should be kind of meaningless
16/11/2012 10:28:49 PM
- 946 Views
I don't really agree
18/11/2012 08:40:53 PM
- 890 Views
Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
19/11/2012 09:13:48 PM
- 961 Views
Re: Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
20/11/2012 08:10:01 AM
- 931 Views
Since I've proven that it's not a normal distribution in units of absolute strength, SDs don't apply
17/11/2012 07:48:21 PM
- 989 Views
You have proven nothing, except that you have an opinion *NM*
18/11/2012 02:21:35 AM
- 637 Views
You simply don't get it. It is mathematically a fact. There is no opinion involved.
18/11/2012 02:19:40 PM
- 834 Views
Only because you've assigned numeric values. That you created.
18/11/2012 02:40:51 PM
- 958 Views
It doesn't matter what figure you use...
18/11/2012 03:01:56 PM
- 839 Views
What if Daigian is one third Lanfear's strength?
18/11/2012 04:37:58 PM
- 981 Views
Sure you can
18/11/2012 10:09:31 PM
- 992 Views
Re: Sure you can
18/11/2012 10:54:50 PM
- 941 Views
You're right, though its 37.5%
19/11/2012 12:21:29 AM
- 906 Views
Oops, typo!
19/11/2012 02:54:25 AM
- 977 Views
Again, not possible, due to Daigian being just 0.3SD below the Mean
19/11/2012 08:37:01 AM
- 928 Views
Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
19/11/2012 04:05:12 PM
- 871 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
19/11/2012 05:55:02 PM
- 798 Views
Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
19/11/2012 09:19:50 PM
- 916 Views
Re: Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
20/11/2012 02:11:26 AM
- 945 Views
Forkroot in every case
20/11/2012 04:32:26 AM
- 925 Views
No!
20/11/2012 03:15:16 PM
- 907 Views
I'm not going to go re-read the books to you on this
20/11/2012 03:39:46 PM
- 925 Views
You need to read it for yourself, since you're completely confused.
20/11/2012 03:54:26 PM
- 889 Views
Not going to argue this with you.
20/11/2012 04:09:44 PM
- 861 Views
Your own example disproved your point...
20/11/2012 04:39:25 PM
- 957 Views
let's see, she's both asleep and would need hours to regain her strength
20/11/2012 04:43:17 PM
- 849 Views
Enough!
20/11/2012 05:04:06 PM
- 937 Views
LOL ... whatever. You go on believing that ... no one else sees it this way. *NM*
20/11/2012 05:20:52 PM
- 625 Views
Re: Your own example disproved your point...
20/11/2012 05:10:15 PM
- 981 Views
Barasine + Katerine isn't that much less than
20/11/2012 05:26:31 PM
- 984 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 02:26:47 AM
- 857 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 09:03:40 AM
- 906 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 02:59:08 PM
- 943 Views
None of this is backed by any evidence...
20/11/2012 03:24:12 PM
- 858 Views
who said Cadsuane was 1.5x Moiraine or more?
20/11/2012 04:03:13 PM
- 861 Views
Nope...
20/11/2012 04:41:35 PM
- 903 Views
wrong
20/11/2012 04:48:50 PM
- 836 Views
Better evidence? LOL!
20/11/2012 03:18:55 PM
- 908 Views
Huh? How did you come to that conclusion?
20/11/2012 04:40:56 PM
- 899 Views
BEcause Cadsuane is close on the heels of Egwene?
20/11/2012 05:10:50 PM
- 817 Views
I'm not arguing that. I agree that Cadsuane is pretty close to Egwene
20/11/2012 05:50:34 PM
- 924 Views
Interesting, but let's go with your figures...
19/11/2012 06:54:54 AM
- 972 Views
Indeed
19/11/2012 08:16:44 AM
- 1012 Views
Rand is sort of a special case
20/11/2012 04:25:02 AM
- 838 Views
Regarding Mesaana...
20/11/2012 08:42:56 AM
- 910 Views
You continue to mix two things
20/11/2012 03:24:44 PM
- 839 Views
No
20/11/2012 04:54:19 PM
- 1058 Views
You are mistaken
20/11/2012 05:04:40 PM
- 918 Views
Probably, but the AS have no idea what 37.5% means
19/11/2012 02:59:26 AM
- 862 Views
It's irrelevant
19/11/2012 03:46:42 AM
- 933 Views
Agreed. Daigian is the marker of the absolute bottom of Aes Sedai strength.
19/11/2012 06:55:41 AM
- 899 Views
Daigian
19/11/2012 08:12:19 AM
- 921 Views
It is a direct marker due to RJ's quote
19/11/2012 08:50:26 AM
- 943 Views
You missed my point
19/11/2012 09:08:42 AM
- 879 Views
Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
20/11/2012 04:41:11 AM
- 887 Views
Re: Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
20/11/2012 09:07:49 AM
- 865 Views
Re: Sure you can
19/11/2012 09:22:09 AM
- 1007 Views
Care to explain this...
19/11/2012 05:06:28 PM
- 848 Views
Indeed
20/11/2012 07:16:37 AM
- 1070 Views
Explained far better than I ever could. Bravo.
20/11/2012 07:30:29 AM
- 886 Views
Well duh.
20/11/2012 02:57:24 PM
- 992 Views
Incorrect.
20/11/2012 04:28:07 PM
- 978 Views
No
20/11/2012 04:44:16 PM
- 954 Views
You're integrating without lower limits...
20/11/2012 02:55:06 PM
- 929 Views
We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
20/11/2012 04:44:24 AM
- 772 Views
Re: We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
20/11/2012 07:02:47 AM
- 965 Views
You must tell me of this special math...
20/11/2012 03:10:09 PM
- 859 Views
Re: You must tell me of this special math...
20/11/2012 04:29:40 PM
- 895 Views
Morghase is a placeholder...
20/11/2012 04:45:42 PM
- 962 Views
Well...
18/11/2012 08:43:59 PM
- 995 Views
Re: Well...
19/11/2012 03:40:44 PM
- 975 Views
Wow.
19/11/2012 03:53:47 PM
- 1022 Views
Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
19/11/2012 06:09:36 PM
- 871 Views
Re: Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
19/11/2012 07:42:58 PM
- 773 Views
this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
20/11/2012 04:51:20 AM
- 967 Views
Re: this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
20/11/2012 02:45:18 PM
- 908 Views
I think RJ went out of his way to keep strength a bit of a mystery
20/11/2012 08:42:44 PM
- 914 Views
Math gurus...Is it possible to find the missing variable...
21/11/2012 05:12:24 PM
- 917 Views
the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
22/11/2012 02:55:03 AM
- 981 Views
Re: the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
22/11/2012 03:15:33 AM
- 1272 Views
I do not think you can calculate the Mean without knowing the Units of Power
22/11/2012 03:53:59 AM
- 1070 Views
Re: Math gurus...Is it possible to find the missing variable...
23/11/2012 02:59:12 PM
- 1203 Views
Disregard this post *NM*
23/11/2012 03:02:24 PM
- 840 Views