Re: Math gurus...Is it possible to find the missing variable...
Tor Send a noteboard - 23/11/2012 02:59:12 PM
Assumption: Morgase is the weakest channeler possible. Since she is 1 out of 105 million that makes her 5.730 729 SD below the mean. See the standard deviation chart on wikipedia that I linked to in the original post.
Assumption: The bell curve is symmetrical and not skewed in one direction or the other. I know some of you disagree (but please humor me for a minute).
Since I don't like strengths less than 0 what I want to do is assign Morgase a strength equal to 1 unit of power. If I assign Morgase 1 unit of power do I have enough information to figure out the mean? In other words if 1 unit of power is equivalent to 5.730 729 SD below the mean can't I figure out the mean? If so, what is the mean?
If it is impossible to figure out the mean using Morgase equal to 1 unit of power and Morgase equal to 5.730 729 SD below the mean, then what other variables need to be known in the math equation
Assumption: The bell curve is symmetrical and not skewed in one direction or the other. I know some of you disagree (but please humor me for a minute).
Since I don't like strengths less than 0 what I want to do is assign Morgase a strength equal to 1 unit of power. If I assign Morgase 1 unit of power do I have enough information to figure out the mean? In other words if 1 unit of power is equivalent to 5.730 729 SD below the mean can't I figure out the mean? If so, what is the mean?
If it is impossible to figure out the mean using Morgase equal to 1 unit of power and Morgase equal to 5.730 729 SD below the mean, then what other variables need to be known in the math equation
There are two parameters that make up a normal distribution, the mean and the standard deviation. If you assume that Morgase is strength 1, and that she is 5.7 standard deviations below the mean, then you could calculate the mean if you knew the standard deviation, or you could calculate the standard deviation if you knew the mean. If you know neither, then you're out of luck.
Technically, knowing Morgase's power and deviation from the mean gives you one equation with two unknowns, which you can't solve.
However, if you have two persons for whom you know the power, and where they fall in the distribution, then that would give you two equations with two unknowns, and you could solve to find both the standard deviation and the mean.
So, if you for example decided that Lanfear is at power 100, and 5.7 standard deviations above the mean, then the mean is 50.5 and the standard deviation 8.7.
However, there are some problems with this approach, as I see it. Firstly, I don't think we have enough information to say that Morgase is unique in her weakness. Secondly, I don't think there is any reason to assume that the distribution has symmetric endpoints. Rather, I think the case can be made for the opposite. If Lanfear is the top, and the bottom is essentially zero, then the mean would be at half the strength of Lanfear. I don't think that agrees with what we see in the books, which must be the ultimate test.
Finally, I don't actually see why knowing the mean and the standard distribution is really that interesting. Placing any given character on the scale is still going to be a matter of comparing quotes and building a hierarchy of people with known strengths, and it seems to be impossible to reach a consensus on even the most frequently described characters.
In my opinion, discussing the normal distribution isn't really helping, in particular since it seems to me that the distribution is mostly being used as a tool to sound scientific, with complete disregard for what the actual data, i.e., the descriptions of character's strength in the books, says.
For example, it has been suggested that if the mean is 50, and the standard deviation is 83, then every character will fall within one standard deviation from the mean. And while this is true, the consequence of this is that channelers of Lanfear's strength should be almost as common as channelers of average strength.
Personally, I think it would be interesting in itself to know the mean and the standard deviation, but I also think that the 20% of the 1000 novices clearly demonstrate that Jordan wasn't sufficiently consistent in the design of his world for it to be meaningful to discuss these things.
If I had the time and the inclination to work out the statistics, I would decide on some arbitrary scale for strength, like 0 to 100, then try to put a number to as many people as possible by a hierarchy of well documented comparisons, so other people could see what I had done and check my assumptions, and then I would draw the curve from those data and extract the mean and the standard deviation from that.
Fram kamerater!
This message last edited by Tor on 23/11/2012 at 03:04:07 PM
How many standard deviations is Lanfear
15/11/2012 06:04:39 PM
- 2201 Views
Hmm...
15/11/2012 07:25:34 PM
- 1338 Views
see we CAN agree on stuff
15/11/2012 07:56:12 PM
- 1174 Views
18/11/2012 08:37:22 PM
- 1047 Views


Re:
18/11/2012 11:07:17 PM
- 1263 Views

Re:
19/11/2012 05:16:00 AM
- 1096 Views

Re:
19/11/2012 03:13:01 PM
- 1083 Views

They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 03:19:19 PM
- 1105 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 04:01:43 PM
- 1305 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 09:04:04 PM
- 1058 Views
Hmmm...
20/11/2012 02:08:40 AM
- 1129 Views
Perhaps, but Egwene is also being a bit dramatic in the scene as she managed
20/11/2012 04:28:57 AM
- 1077 Views
Nope...
20/11/2012 03:13:13 PM
- 1131 Views
I believe she is being over dramatic
20/11/2012 03:26:24 PM
- 1022 Views
Keep believing that...
20/11/2012 03:30:14 PM
- 1161 Views
*shrugs*
20/11/2012 03:49:10 PM
- 1109 Views
Tired and forkroot are the same now?
20/11/2012 03:55:22 PM
- 1010 Views
No it's the literary device
20/11/2012 04:04:28 PM
- 1143 Views
Impossible. Daigian is exactly 0.32SD below the mean
19/11/2012 11:06:04 AM
- 1084 Views
You keep saying that, but it is either a linear or a non-linear distribution
19/11/2012 09:09:32 PM
- 1137 Views
That's the whole point. Thanks for finally seeing it.
19/11/2012 09:43:27 PM
- 1093 Views
keep believing that ... but you making up numbers isn't really relevant *NM*
20/11/2012 04:29:44 AM
- 694 Views
Please show me a number that is made up. The 0.32SD for Daigian is a rule of statistics.
20/11/2012 07:15:48 AM
- 1051 Views
Ugh. I hate power level discussions. For real world applications, it should be kind of meaningless
16/11/2012 10:28:49 PM
- 1036 Views
I don't really agree
18/11/2012 08:40:53 PM
- 1010 Views
Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
19/11/2012 09:13:48 PM
- 1059 Views
Re: Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
20/11/2012 08:10:01 AM
- 1030 Views
Since I've proven that it's not a normal distribution in units of absolute strength, SDs don't apply
17/11/2012 07:48:21 PM
- 1086 Views
You have proven nothing, except that you have an opinion *NM*
18/11/2012 02:21:35 AM
- 668 Views
You simply don't get it. It is mathematically a fact. There is no opinion involved.
18/11/2012 02:19:40 PM
- 922 Views
Only because you've assigned numeric values. That you created.
18/11/2012 02:40:51 PM
- 1056 Views
It doesn't matter what figure you use...
18/11/2012 03:01:56 PM
- 933 Views
What if Daigian is one third Lanfear's strength?
18/11/2012 04:37:58 PM
- 1088 Views
Sure you can
18/11/2012 10:09:31 PM
- 1086 Views
Re: Sure you can
18/11/2012 10:54:50 PM
- 1056 Views
You're right, though its 37.5%
19/11/2012 12:21:29 AM
- 1009 Views
Oops, typo!
19/11/2012 02:54:25 AM
- 1065 Views
Again, not possible, due to Daigian being just 0.3SD below the Mean
19/11/2012 08:37:01 AM
- 1019 Views
Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
19/11/2012 04:05:12 PM
- 941 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
19/11/2012 05:55:02 PM
- 901 Views
Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
19/11/2012 09:19:50 PM
- 1020 Views
Re: Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
20/11/2012 02:11:26 AM
- 1055 Views
Forkroot in every case
20/11/2012 04:32:26 AM
- 1018 Views
No!
20/11/2012 03:15:16 PM
- 1004 Views
I'm not going to go re-read the books to you on this
20/11/2012 03:39:46 PM
- 1033 Views
You need to read it for yourself, since you're completely confused.
20/11/2012 03:54:26 PM
- 986 Views
Not going to argue this with you.
20/11/2012 04:09:44 PM
- 948 Views
Your own example disproved your point...
20/11/2012 04:39:25 PM
- 1064 Views
let's see, she's both asleep and would need hours to regain her strength
20/11/2012 04:43:17 PM
- 962 Views
Enough!
20/11/2012 05:04:06 PM
- 1031 Views
LOL ... whatever. You go on believing that ... no one else sees it this way. *NM*
20/11/2012 05:20:52 PM
- 660 Views
Re: Your own example disproved your point...
20/11/2012 05:10:15 PM
- 1072 Views
Barasine + Katerine isn't that much less than
20/11/2012 05:26:31 PM
- 1065 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 02:26:47 AM
- 971 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 09:03:40 AM
- 1008 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 02:59:08 PM
- 1041 Views
None of this is backed by any evidence...
20/11/2012 03:24:12 PM
- 972 Views
who said Cadsuane was 1.5x Moiraine or more?
20/11/2012 04:03:13 PM
- 981 Views
Nope...
20/11/2012 04:41:35 PM
- 993 Views
wrong
20/11/2012 04:48:50 PM
- 932 Views
Better evidence? LOL!
20/11/2012 03:18:55 PM
- 1020 Views
Huh? How did you come to that conclusion?
20/11/2012 04:40:56 PM
- 1012 Views
BEcause Cadsuane is close on the heels of Egwene?
20/11/2012 05:10:50 PM
- 917 Views
I'm not arguing that. I agree that Cadsuane is pretty close to Egwene
20/11/2012 05:50:34 PM
- 1029 Views
Interesting, but let's go with your figures...
19/11/2012 06:54:54 AM
- 1055 Views
Indeed
19/11/2012 08:16:44 AM
- 1112 Views
Rand is sort of a special case
20/11/2012 04:25:02 AM
- 962 Views
Regarding Mesaana...
20/11/2012 08:42:56 AM
- 1010 Views
You continue to mix two things
20/11/2012 03:24:44 PM
- 936 Views
No
20/11/2012 04:54:19 PM
- 1167 Views
You are mistaken
20/11/2012 05:04:40 PM
- 1021 Views
Probably, but the AS have no idea what 37.5% means
19/11/2012 02:59:26 AM
- 970 Views
It's irrelevant
19/11/2012 03:46:42 AM
- 1039 Views
Agreed. Daigian is the marker of the absolute bottom of Aes Sedai strength.
19/11/2012 06:55:41 AM
- 1003 Views
Daigian
19/11/2012 08:12:19 AM
- 1015 Views
It is a direct marker due to RJ's quote
19/11/2012 08:50:26 AM
- 1039 Views
You missed my point
19/11/2012 09:08:42 AM
- 967 Views
Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
20/11/2012 04:41:11 AM
- 978 Views
Re: Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
20/11/2012 09:07:49 AM
- 974 Views
Re: Sure you can
19/11/2012 09:22:09 AM
- 1093 Views
Care to explain this...
19/11/2012 05:06:28 PM
- 930 Views
Indeed
20/11/2012 07:16:37 AM
- 1126 Views
Explained far better than I ever could. Bravo.
20/11/2012 07:30:29 AM
- 980 Views
Well duh.
20/11/2012 02:57:24 PM
- 1088 Views
Incorrect.
20/11/2012 04:28:07 PM
- 1077 Views
No
20/11/2012 04:44:16 PM
- 1056 Views
You're integrating without lower limits...
20/11/2012 02:55:06 PM
- 1034 Views
We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
20/11/2012 04:44:24 AM
- 876 Views
Re: We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
20/11/2012 07:02:47 AM
- 1078 Views
You must tell me of this special math...
20/11/2012 03:10:09 PM
- 954 Views
Re: You must tell me of this special math...
20/11/2012 04:29:40 PM
- 1009 Views
Morghase is a placeholder...
20/11/2012 04:45:42 PM
- 1091 Views
Well...
18/11/2012 08:43:59 PM
- 1083 Views
Re: Well...
19/11/2012 03:40:44 PM
- 1064 Views
Wow.
19/11/2012 03:53:47 PM
- 1088 Views
Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
19/11/2012 06:09:36 PM
- 989 Views
Re: Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
19/11/2012 07:42:58 PM
- 870 Views
this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
20/11/2012 04:51:20 AM
- 1081 Views
Re: this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
20/11/2012 02:45:18 PM
- 998 Views
I think RJ went out of his way to keep strength a bit of a mystery
20/11/2012 08:42:44 PM
- 1007 Views
Math gurus...Is it possible to find the missing variable...
21/11/2012 05:12:24 PM
- 1021 Views
the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
22/11/2012 02:55:03 AM
- 1067 Views
Re: the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
22/11/2012 03:15:33 AM
- 1386 Views
I do not think you can calculate the Mean without knowing the Units of Power
22/11/2012 03:53:59 AM
- 1157 Views
Re: Math gurus...Is it possible to find the missing variable...
23/11/2012 02:59:12 PM
- 1296 Views