Active Users:1064 Time:25/12/2024 06:45:22 AM
Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid Sidious Send a noteboard - 19/11/2012 06:09:36 PM
You can't really substantiate that opinion. There are several quotes stating that Ishamael equalled Lews Therin in power.


But none of them is verbatim, all of them are interpretations from AOL texts by third agers, and we cban't be sure the texts themselves truly referred to his OP raw strength and not to the power he wielded in the Shadow being comparable to LTT's in the Light. The other problem is that we know this comes from AS interpretation of AOL texts (or worse, Breaking and post-Breaking ones), and today's AS judge "power" on raw saidar potential, whereas all the signs in the series suggest AOLers also include skills when they speak of an Aes Sedai's power (they differentiate between strength and global power), that raw strength is only a factor in their global description (which only makes sense in a world full of angreal...). Mierin was as strong as any woman, yet she was only an Aes Sedai of middling power who never achieved anything worthy of a third name honorific. Her OP skills musn't be so amazing for someone as strong, she was a good OP scientist, good enough to enter the Collam Daan, but by the standards of her Age not remarkable, not enough to get any public attention for her skills. Just that might suggest she's not as powerful as LTT, that her mastery over saidar isn't enough to match his strength in saidin by higher efficiency.

The problem with Ishamael being so strong in saidin is that if he is, combined with his status as Nae'blis, it's extremely hard to understand why Demandred doesn't hate him just as much as he hates LTT. He envies Moridin's status, but nothing else. Demandred acts toward Moridin as if he is the stronger of the two.

Moridin is clearly strong, but I don't think we can be in any way certain of his exact strength, not even how he compares in raw strength to Demandred (who was second only to LTT) or Aginor (who had rare amazing skills in some areas that could very well taint his description as "powerful", unless we have a direct quote Dashiva matches Rand or almost in raw strength).



I've been saying this for ten years. Great to see you saying it so unexpectedly.

Totally agree.


The BWB says straight out that Ishamael was the strongest of the Chosen, and it is WoT canon (up to when it was written). I understand Dominic's points and think they're all valid but you've merely been on a mission for a decade to prove that Demandred is the strongest of the Chosen, but that can't be backed up anywhere. He may be the strongest and most skilled overall, but in terms of raw power, Ishamael is stronger.

There is not a shred of proof that suggests that Ishamael might not have been the strongest of the Forsaken, and plenty of quotes stating that he was, albeit 'legendary knowledge' or hearsay. It may be wrong, but you can't make a counter theory with zero evidence either. Aginor and Demandred were second in power - the BWB says so.

Unless it's refuted by Brandon, it will never be more than a conspiracy theory that Ishamael was not the strongest. IMO RJ made it obvious who the strongest of all the Forsaken was, and that was Ishamael.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
How many standard deviations is Lanfear - 15/11/2012 06:04:39 PM 2090 Views
Well... - 15/11/2012 07:02:45 PM 1126 Views
Hmm... - 15/11/2012 07:25:34 PM 1232 Views
see we CAN agree on stuff - 15/11/2012 07:56:12 PM 1077 Views
- 18/11/2012 08:37:22 PM 969 Views
We've always been close with everything except the scale - 18/11/2012 10:29:07 PM 1009 Views
Re: - 18/11/2012 11:07:17 PM 1173 Views
Re: - 19/11/2012 05:16:00 AM 1005 Views
Re: - 19/11/2012 03:13:01 PM 1005 Views
They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5% - 19/11/2012 03:19:19 PM 1015 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5% - 19/11/2012 04:01:43 PM 1219 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5% - 19/11/2012 09:04:04 PM 962 Views
Hmmm... - 20/11/2012 02:08:40 AM 1032 Views
Perhaps, but Egwene is also being a bit dramatic in the scene as she managed - 20/11/2012 04:28:57 AM 986 Views
Nope... - 20/11/2012 03:13:13 PM 1035 Views
I believe she is being over dramatic - 20/11/2012 03:26:24 PM 934 Views
Keep believing that... - 20/11/2012 03:30:14 PM 1067 Views
*shrugs* - 20/11/2012 03:49:10 PM 1015 Views
Tired and forkroot are the same now? - 20/11/2012 03:55:22 PM 921 Views
No it's the literary device - 20/11/2012 04:04:28 PM 1044 Views
This is getting ridiculous... - 20/11/2012 04:43:13 PM 920 Views
You are missing my point completely - 20/11/2012 04:50:46 PM 884 Views
Impossible. Daigian is exactly 0.32SD below the mean - 19/11/2012 11:06:04 AM 992 Views
You keep saying that, but it is either a linear or a non-linear distribution - 19/11/2012 09:09:32 PM 1047 Views
That's the whole point. Thanks for finally seeing it. - 19/11/2012 09:43:27 PM 1006 Views
keep believing that ... but you making up numbers isn't really relevant *NM* - 20/11/2012 04:29:44 AM 659 Views
Please show me a number that is made up. The 0.32SD for Daigian is a rule of statistics. - 20/11/2012 07:15:48 AM 970 Views
Go read Fionwe's post about it *NM* - 20/11/2012 02:33:19 PM 672 Views
Is that before or after she started juicing? - 15/11/2012 11:04:14 PM 989 Views
Wouldn't it be 1 in 105 million? - 21/11/2012 04:56:19 PM 837 Views
Are you sure that it is a normal distribution? - 16/11/2012 04:21:02 PM 1060 Views
Ugh. I hate power level discussions. For real world applications, it should be kind of meaningless - 16/11/2012 10:28:49 PM 959 Views
I don't really agree - 18/11/2012 08:40:53 PM 899 Views
Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel - 19/11/2012 09:13:48 PM 976 Views
Re: Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel - 20/11/2012 08:10:01 AM 942 Views
probably ... Lanfear/Cyndane is clearly remarkably skilled - 20/11/2012 02:35:09 PM 984 Views
Since I've proven that it's not a normal distribution in units of absolute strength, SDs don't apply - 17/11/2012 07:48:21 PM 996 Views
You have proven nothing, except that you have an opinion *NM* - 18/11/2012 02:21:35 AM 641 Views
You simply don't get it. It is mathematically a fact. There is no opinion involved. - 18/11/2012 02:19:40 PM 846 Views
Only because you've assigned numeric values. That you created. - 18/11/2012 02:40:51 PM 971 Views
It doesn't matter what figure you use... - 18/11/2012 03:01:56 PM 846 Views
What if Daigian is one third Lanfear's strength? - 18/11/2012 04:37:58 PM 992 Views
We have a limit for Daigian's strength, as you well know. - 18/11/2012 05:41:49 PM 944 Views
Are you kidding me? - 18/11/2012 09:07:38 PM 1105 Views
Sure you can - 18/11/2012 10:09:31 PM 1003 Views
Re: Sure you can - 18/11/2012 10:54:50 PM 952 Views
You're right, though its 37.5% - 19/11/2012 12:21:29 AM 920 Views
Oops, typo! - 19/11/2012 02:54:25 AM 987 Views
Again, not possible, due to Daigian being just 0.3SD below the Mean - 19/11/2012 08:37:01 AM 940 Views
Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys... - 19/11/2012 04:05:12 PM 882 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys... - 19/11/2012 05:55:02 PM 809 Views
Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined - 19/11/2012 09:19:50 PM 932 Views
Re: Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined - 20/11/2012 02:11:26 AM 956 Views
Forkroot in every case - 20/11/2012 04:32:26 AM 937 Views
No! - 20/11/2012 03:15:16 PM 917 Views
I'm not going to go re-read the books to you on this - 20/11/2012 03:39:46 PM 936 Views
You need to read it for yourself, since you're completely confused. - 20/11/2012 03:54:26 PM 900 Views
Not going to argue this with you. - 20/11/2012 04:09:44 PM 877 Views
Your own example disproved your point... - 20/11/2012 04:39:25 PM 981 Views
let's see, she's both asleep and would need hours to regain her strength - 20/11/2012 04:43:17 PM 863 Views
Enough! - 20/11/2012 05:04:06 PM 948 Views
LOL ... whatever. You go on believing that ... no one else sees it this way. *NM* - 20/11/2012 05:20:52 PM 629 Views
What a brilliant argument! - 20/11/2012 05:25:18 PM 985 Views
this is why I refuse to continue this debate - 20/11/2012 05:31:11 PM 903 Views
Re: Your own example disproved your point... - 20/11/2012 05:10:15 PM 992 Views
Barasine + Katerine isn't that much less than - 20/11/2012 05:26:31 PM 998 Views
Re: Barasine + Katerine isn't that much less than - 20/11/2012 05:31:50 PM 940 Views
Re: Barasine + Katerine isn't that much less than - 20/11/2012 05:42:53 PM 938 Views
Excuse me? - 20/11/2012 05:28:48 PM 991 Views
see we can agree on the relative strength of Egwene v. Forsaken - 20/11/2012 05:35:07 PM 945 Views
??? - 20/11/2012 05:37:01 PM 1014 Views
2 middling sisters - 20/11/2012 05:45:27 PM 957 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys... - 20/11/2012 02:26:47 AM 869 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys... - 20/11/2012 09:03:40 AM 920 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys... - 20/11/2012 02:59:08 PM 954 Views
None of this is backed by any evidence... - 20/11/2012 03:24:12 PM 873 Views
who said Cadsuane was 1.5x Moiraine or more? - 20/11/2012 04:03:13 PM 883 Views
Nope... - 20/11/2012 04:41:35 PM 910 Views
wrong - 20/11/2012 04:48:50 PM 850 Views
My bad. Mized up 1/3 and 2/3. - 20/11/2012 05:05:05 PM 941 Views
gotcha *NM* - 20/11/2012 05:46:21 PM 590 Views
Better evidence? LOL! - 20/11/2012 03:18:55 PM 922 Views
Huh? How did you come to that conclusion? - 20/11/2012 04:40:56 PM 915 Views
Exactly *NM* - 20/11/2012 04:55:28 PM 888 Views
BEcause Cadsuane is close on the heels of Egwene? - 20/11/2012 05:10:50 PM 831 Views
I'm not arguing that. I agree that Cadsuane is pretty close to Egwene - 20/11/2012 05:50:34 PM 935 Views
Re: Better evidence? LOL! - 20/11/2012 05:00:47 PM 845 Views
Interesting, but let's go with your figures... - 19/11/2012 06:54:54 AM 982 Views
Indeed - 19/11/2012 08:16:44 AM 1029 Views
Rand is sort of a special case - 20/11/2012 04:25:02 AM 853 Views
Regarding Mesaana... - 20/11/2012 08:42:56 AM 929 Views
You continue to mix two things - 20/11/2012 03:24:44 PM 850 Views
No - 20/11/2012 04:54:19 PM 1076 Views
You are mistaken - 20/11/2012 05:04:40 PM 929 Views
Yes she did Darius! - 20/11/2012 05:27:36 PM 868 Views
Yet there is no duel - 20/11/2012 06:01:17 PM 855 Views
Explain the .3xSD thing to me... - 19/11/2012 04:58:57 PM 1095 Views
Probably, but the AS have no idea what 37.5% means - 19/11/2012 02:59:26 AM 876 Views
It's irrelevant - 19/11/2012 03:46:42 AM 948 Views
Agreed. Daigian is the marker of the absolute bottom of Aes Sedai strength. - 19/11/2012 06:55:41 AM 911 Views
Daigian - 19/11/2012 08:12:19 AM 930 Views
It is a direct marker due to RJ's quote - 19/11/2012 08:50:26 AM 963 Views
You missed my point - 19/11/2012 09:08:42 AM 890 Views
Re: You missed my point - 19/11/2012 02:18:33 PM 971 Views
Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS - 20/11/2012 04:41:11 AM 904 Views
Re: Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS - 20/11/2012 09:07:49 AM 879 Views
Which would make an average AS around a 30 - 20/11/2012 04:58:56 PM 749 Views
Re: Sure you can - 19/11/2012 09:22:09 AM 1018 Views
Care to explain this... - 19/11/2012 05:06:28 PM 858 Views
Indeed - 20/11/2012 07:16:37 AM 1079 Views
Explained far better than I ever could. Bravo. - 20/11/2012 07:30:29 AM 901 Views
Well duh. - 20/11/2012 02:57:24 PM 1006 Views
Incorrect. - 20/11/2012 04:28:07 PM 993 Views
No - 20/11/2012 04:44:16 PM 969 Views
Re: No - 20/11/2012 04:48:36 PM 959 Views
That depends... - 20/11/2012 05:18:46 PM 828 Views
Re: That depends... - 20/11/2012 05:31:03 PM 1258 Views
You're integrating without lower limits... - 20/11/2012 02:55:06 PM 941 Views
Re: You're integrating without lower limits... - 20/11/2012 04:37:57 PM 968 Views
It matters. - 20/11/2012 05:22:40 PM 940 Views
We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case - 20/11/2012 04:44:24 AM 790 Views
Re: We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case - 20/11/2012 07:02:47 AM 979 Views
You must tell me of this special math... - 20/11/2012 03:10:09 PM 874 Views
Re: You must tell me of this special math... - 20/11/2012 04:29:40 PM 907 Views
Morghase is a placeholder... - 20/11/2012 04:45:42 PM 973 Views
Re: Morghase is a placeholder... - 20/11/2012 04:49:54 PM 1157 Views
Why? - 20/11/2012 05:23:29 PM 960 Views
Re: Why? - 20/11/2012 05:36:45 PM 1132 Views
Well... - 18/11/2012 08:43:59 PM 1005 Views
Re: Well... - 19/11/2012 03:40:44 PM 988 Views
Wow. - 19/11/2012 03:53:47 PM 1034 Views
Re: Wow. - 19/11/2012 04:26:09 PM 1043 Views
Some points - 19/11/2012 06:03:00 PM 1043 Views
Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid - 19/11/2012 06:09:36 PM 890 Views
Re: Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid - 19/11/2012 07:42:58 PM 788 Views
this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power - 20/11/2012 04:51:20 AM 980 Views
Agreed - 20/11/2012 08:13:37 AM 1010 Views
probably - 20/11/2012 06:18:45 PM 892 Views
Re: this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power - 20/11/2012 02:45:18 PM 927 Views
I think RJ went out of his way to keep strength a bit of a mystery - 20/11/2012 08:42:44 PM 927 Views
Indeed... - 21/11/2012 05:44:18 PM 902 Views
I agree - 22/11/2012 01:43:02 AM 1153 Views
Math gurus...Is it possible to find the missing variable... - 21/11/2012 05:12:24 PM 935 Views
the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really - 22/11/2012 02:55:03 AM 990 Views
Re: the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really - 22/11/2012 03:15:33 AM 1289 Views
I do not think you can calculate the Mean without knowing the Units of Power - 22/11/2012 03:53:59 AM 1080 Views
Re: Math gurus...Is it possible to find the missing variable... - 23/11/2012 02:59:12 PM 1212 Views
Disregard this post *NM* - 23/11/2012 03:02:24 PM 845 Views

Reply to Message