You can't really substantiate that opinion. There are several quotes stating that Ishamael equalled Lews Therin in power.
But none of them is verbatim, all of them are interpretations from AOL texts by third agers, and we cban't be sure the texts themselves truly referred to his OP raw strength and not to the power he wielded in the Shadow being comparable to LTT's in the Light. The other problem is that we know this comes from AS interpretation of AOL texts (or worse, Breaking and post-Breaking ones), and today's AS judge "power" on raw saidar potential, whereas all the signs in the series suggest AOLers also include skills when they speak of an Aes Sedai's power (they differentiate between strength and global power), that raw strength is only a factor in their global description (which only makes sense in a world full of angreal...). Mierin was as strong as any woman, yet she was only an Aes Sedai of middling power who never achieved anything worthy of a third name honorific. Her OP skills musn't be so amazing for someone as strong, she was a good OP scientist, good enough to enter the Collam Daan, but by the standards of her Age not remarkable, not enough to get any public attention for her skills. Just that might suggest she's not as powerful as LTT, that her mastery over saidar isn't enough to match his strength in saidin by higher efficiency.
The problem with Ishamael being so strong in saidin is that if he is, combined with his status as Nae'blis, it's extremely hard to understand why Demandred doesn't hate him just as much as he hates LTT. He envies Moridin's status, but nothing else. Demandred acts toward Moridin as if he is the stronger of the two.
Moridin is clearly strong, but I don't think we can be in any way certain of his exact strength, not even how he compares in raw strength to Demandred (who was second only to LTT) or Aginor (who had rare amazing skills in some areas that could very well taint his description as "powerful", unless we have a direct quote Dashiva matches Rand or almost in raw strength).
I've been saying this for ten years. Great to see you saying it so unexpectedly.
Totally agree.
Well I've been saying for years now the Forsaken info from the AOL is unreliable unless it comes from one of them directly or from LTT's memories, and even then we have to pay great attention to the context.
We don't agree on all things in this. For instance it's clear LTT and Bel Medar developped great fighting/warfare related skills, but I don't agree the quotes about them being "the greatest of the Age" are reliable to judge of their OP skills. All we can be certain of is that it refers to their social status. Both were Guild administrators of very high standing, and both were high profile public figures (novelists, it appears - Jordan's little joke). It's fairly doubtful they were the best channelers of their time pre WOS. Neither were probably matches, not even close, for the best channelers at the Collam Daan. There's only two Chosen we know had exceptional, remarkable OP skills in their Age beyond any doubt, and they're Aginor and Semirhage. Aginor more than Semirhage. AS used the OP for music, so maybe Asmodean shone in that area, but we can't be sure. Graendal's reknown had nothing to do with her skills or strength. For now there's no solid evidence LTT's skills were that exceptional, and by extension Demandred's. The Chosen (incl. Demandred) all seem to find Mesaana's knowledge reliable and useful, for instance, and she was a failed OP scholar... That gives an idea where the top scientists stood, if the Chosen consider Mesaana knowledgeable (and curiously, none of them ever referred to Lanfear's scholarly knowledge... which highly suggests her speciality was fairly narrow, and obviously it was tel'aran'rhiod)...
How many standard deviations is Lanfear
15/11/2012 06:04:39 PM
- 2090 Views
Hmm...
15/11/2012 07:25:34 PM
- 1232 Views
see we CAN agree on stuff
15/11/2012 07:56:12 PM
- 1078 Views
18/11/2012 08:37:22 PM
- 970 Views
Re:
18/11/2012 11:07:17 PM
- 1174 Views
Re:
19/11/2012 05:16:00 AM
- 1006 Views
Re:
19/11/2012 03:13:01 PM
- 1006 Views
They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 03:19:19 PM
- 1016 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 04:01:43 PM
- 1220 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 09:04:04 PM
- 962 Views
Hmmm...
20/11/2012 02:08:40 AM
- 1033 Views
Perhaps, but Egwene is also being a bit dramatic in the scene as she managed
20/11/2012 04:28:57 AM
- 987 Views
Nope...
20/11/2012 03:13:13 PM
- 1036 Views
I believe she is being over dramatic
20/11/2012 03:26:24 PM
- 935 Views
Keep believing that...
20/11/2012 03:30:14 PM
- 1068 Views
*shrugs*
20/11/2012 03:49:10 PM
- 1015 Views
Tired and forkroot are the same now?
20/11/2012 03:55:22 PM
- 922 Views
No it's the literary device
20/11/2012 04:04:28 PM
- 1045 Views
Impossible. Daigian is exactly 0.32SD below the mean
19/11/2012 11:06:04 AM
- 993 Views
You keep saying that, but it is either a linear or a non-linear distribution
19/11/2012 09:09:32 PM
- 1048 Views
That's the whole point. Thanks for finally seeing it.
19/11/2012 09:43:27 PM
- 1007 Views
keep believing that ... but you making up numbers isn't really relevant *NM*
20/11/2012 04:29:44 AM
- 660 Views
Please show me a number that is made up. The 0.32SD for Daigian is a rule of statistics.
20/11/2012 07:15:48 AM
- 971 Views
Ugh. I hate power level discussions. For real world applications, it should be kind of meaningless
16/11/2012 10:28:49 PM
- 960 Views
I don't really agree
18/11/2012 08:40:53 PM
- 899 Views
Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
19/11/2012 09:13:48 PM
- 977 Views
Re: Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
20/11/2012 08:10:01 AM
- 943 Views
Since I've proven that it's not a normal distribution in units of absolute strength, SDs don't apply
17/11/2012 07:48:21 PM
- 996 Views
You have proven nothing, except that you have an opinion *NM*
18/11/2012 02:21:35 AM
- 642 Views
You simply don't get it. It is mathematically a fact. There is no opinion involved.
18/11/2012 02:19:40 PM
- 847 Views
Only because you've assigned numeric values. That you created.
18/11/2012 02:40:51 PM
- 972 Views
It doesn't matter what figure you use...
18/11/2012 03:01:56 PM
- 847 Views
What if Daigian is one third Lanfear's strength?
18/11/2012 04:37:58 PM
- 993 Views
Sure you can
18/11/2012 10:09:31 PM
- 1004 Views
Re: Sure you can
18/11/2012 10:54:50 PM
- 953 Views
You're right, though its 37.5%
19/11/2012 12:21:29 AM
- 921 Views
Oops, typo!
19/11/2012 02:54:25 AM
- 987 Views
Again, not possible, due to Daigian being just 0.3SD below the Mean
19/11/2012 08:37:01 AM
- 941 Views
Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
19/11/2012 04:05:12 PM
- 882 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
19/11/2012 05:55:02 PM
- 809 Views
Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
19/11/2012 09:19:50 PM
- 933 Views
Re: Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
20/11/2012 02:11:26 AM
- 957 Views
Forkroot in every case
20/11/2012 04:32:26 AM
- 938 Views
No!
20/11/2012 03:15:16 PM
- 918 Views
I'm not going to go re-read the books to you on this
20/11/2012 03:39:46 PM
- 936 Views
You need to read it for yourself, since you're completely confused.
20/11/2012 03:54:26 PM
- 900 Views
Not going to argue this with you.
20/11/2012 04:09:44 PM
- 878 Views
Your own example disproved your point...
20/11/2012 04:39:25 PM
- 981 Views
let's see, she's both asleep and would need hours to regain her strength
20/11/2012 04:43:17 PM
- 864 Views
Enough!
20/11/2012 05:04:06 PM
- 949 Views
LOL ... whatever. You go on believing that ... no one else sees it this way. *NM*
20/11/2012 05:20:52 PM
- 630 Views
Re: Your own example disproved your point...
20/11/2012 05:10:15 PM
- 993 Views
Barasine + Katerine isn't that much less than
20/11/2012 05:26:31 PM
- 999 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 02:26:47 AM
- 870 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 09:03:40 AM
- 921 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 02:59:08 PM
- 955 Views
None of this is backed by any evidence...
20/11/2012 03:24:12 PM
- 874 Views
who said Cadsuane was 1.5x Moiraine or more?
20/11/2012 04:03:13 PM
- 884 Views
Nope...
20/11/2012 04:41:35 PM
- 911 Views
wrong
20/11/2012 04:48:50 PM
- 851 Views
Better evidence? LOL!
20/11/2012 03:18:55 PM
- 923 Views
Huh? How did you come to that conclusion?
20/11/2012 04:40:56 PM
- 916 Views
BEcause Cadsuane is close on the heels of Egwene?
20/11/2012 05:10:50 PM
- 832 Views
I'm not arguing that. I agree that Cadsuane is pretty close to Egwene
20/11/2012 05:50:34 PM
- 935 Views
Interesting, but let's go with your figures...
19/11/2012 06:54:54 AM
- 983 Views
Indeed
19/11/2012 08:16:44 AM
- 1030 Views
Rand is sort of a special case
20/11/2012 04:25:02 AM
- 854 Views
Regarding Mesaana...
20/11/2012 08:42:56 AM
- 930 Views
You continue to mix two things
20/11/2012 03:24:44 PM
- 851 Views
No
20/11/2012 04:54:19 PM
- 1077 Views
You are mistaken
20/11/2012 05:04:40 PM
- 930 Views
Probably, but the AS have no idea what 37.5% means
19/11/2012 02:59:26 AM
- 876 Views
It's irrelevant
19/11/2012 03:46:42 AM
- 948 Views
Agreed. Daigian is the marker of the absolute bottom of Aes Sedai strength.
19/11/2012 06:55:41 AM
- 912 Views
Daigian
19/11/2012 08:12:19 AM
- 931 Views
It is a direct marker due to RJ's quote
19/11/2012 08:50:26 AM
- 963 Views
You missed my point
19/11/2012 09:08:42 AM
- 890 Views
Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
20/11/2012 04:41:11 AM
- 905 Views
Re: Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
20/11/2012 09:07:49 AM
- 880 Views
Re: Sure you can
19/11/2012 09:22:09 AM
- 1019 Views
Care to explain this...
19/11/2012 05:06:28 PM
- 859 Views
Indeed
20/11/2012 07:16:37 AM
- 1080 Views
Explained far better than I ever could. Bravo.
20/11/2012 07:30:29 AM
- 902 Views
Well duh.
20/11/2012 02:57:24 PM
- 1007 Views
Incorrect.
20/11/2012 04:28:07 PM
- 993 Views
No
20/11/2012 04:44:16 PM
- 970 Views
You're integrating without lower limits...
20/11/2012 02:55:06 PM
- 942 Views
We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
20/11/2012 04:44:24 AM
- 791 Views
Re: We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
20/11/2012 07:02:47 AM
- 979 Views
You must tell me of this special math...
20/11/2012 03:10:09 PM
- 875 Views
Re: You must tell me of this special math...
20/11/2012 04:29:40 PM
- 908 Views
Morghase is a placeholder...
20/11/2012 04:45:42 PM
- 974 Views
Well...
18/11/2012 08:43:59 PM
- 1006 Views
Re: Well...
19/11/2012 03:40:44 PM
- 989 Views
Wow.
19/11/2012 03:53:47 PM
- 1035 Views
Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
19/11/2012 06:09:36 PM
- 890 Views
Re: Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
19/11/2012 07:42:58 PM
- 789 Views
this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
20/11/2012 04:51:20 AM
- 981 Views
Re: this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
20/11/2012 02:45:18 PM
- 928 Views
I think RJ went out of his way to keep strength a bit of a mystery
20/11/2012 08:42:44 PM
- 928 Views
Math gurus...Is it possible to find the missing variable...
21/11/2012 05:12:24 PM
- 935 Views
the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
22/11/2012 02:55:03 AM
- 991 Views
Re: the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
22/11/2012 03:15:33 AM
- 1289 Views
I do not think you can calculate the Mean without knowing the Units of Power
22/11/2012 03:53:59 AM
- 1081 Views