Active Users:353 Time:26/04/2025 01:22:34 PM
You have 4 markers and you should use them all Robert Jordan Send a noteboard - 10/11/2012 03:08:37 PM
Morgase is 6 standard deviations from the mean and Lanfear is 6 SD above the mean. You should use Morgase, Daigian, Moiraine, and Lanfear as markers. You will get better numbers that way.

In other words, if you set Morgase at 1.0 linear strength and her strength is also equal to 6 SD below the mean you will get much better numbers. Work your way up from Morgase and you'll find that Lanfear is far, far above 100 points on a linear scale.

In other words, everyone has been trying to fit the curve onto a 100 point scale. That is a mistake. If you do what I'm suggesting and you stop thinking as 100 as the maximum (e.g. Lanfear might be at 300 or 400 or whatever) then you'll get much better numbers.

Hope this helps
Reply to message
Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 31/10/2012 11:30:42 AM 1570 Views
Who said RJ created a 100 point scale? I always assumed we did to make this easier to follow - 31/10/2012 02:22:51 PM 913 Views
One more point here - 31/10/2012 03:02:34 PM 788 Views
I've think I've finally done it. I've solved the entire Curve. Daigian is the key... - 01/11/2012 09:20:57 AM 1024 Views
Did some playing with your numbers to make this work better - 01/11/2012 02:13:00 PM 978 Views
The Mean and SD are set by Daigian's position. Your options are therefore not possible... - 02/11/2012 07:49:24 AM 938 Views
Yet you have many more SD between the Mean and Lanfear than you do Morgase and the Mean - 02/11/2012 02:39:51 PM 802 Views
I absolutely agree. The lower side of the curve MUST be intersected by zero after 1 SD... - 02/11/2012 03:03:52 PM 675 Views
I am not convinced Moiraine is the Mean. Merely 50% of Lanfear - 02/11/2012 04:23:57 PM 852 Views
But on a Bell Curve the Mean IS 50% of Lanfear. You've just disproven your own contention. - 02/11/2012 04:40:31 PM 768 Views
OMG no it is NOT! - 02/11/2012 05:16:36 PM 671 Views
I agree with that. But please honestly look at the math I presented. It disproves the Bell Curve. - 02/11/2012 05:24:41 PM 970 Views
It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved. - 02/11/2012 06:07:19 PM 804 Views
Confusing post... - 02/11/2012 06:30:40 PM 864 Views
Dreadlord is essentially describing a lognormal distribution - 02/11/2012 07:21:39 PM 755 Views
If you choose to ignore the author go right ahead. I just think you are wrong - 02/11/2012 09:05:14 PM 896 Views
A non-linear 21 point scale is fine... - 02/11/2012 11:02:48 PM 925 Views
I've been operating off of the scale I described for years - 02/11/2012 11:25:27 PM 806 Views
Re: It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved. - 02/11/2012 07:11:57 PM 792 Views
Not true - 02/11/2012 08:52:42 PM 848 Views
Re: Not true - 03/11/2012 09:19:11 AM 801 Views
Read my other posts - 03/11/2012 04:19:15 PM 669 Views
Not quite - 03/11/2012 08:02:05 AM 816 Views
I think it's about skill not strength - 03/11/2012 04:38:07 PM 682 Views
I think the number is about 10 - 03/11/2012 08:42:08 AM 867 Views
Nope - 03/11/2012 04:14:45 PM 790 Views
Re: Nope - 03/11/2012 04:39:07 PM 826 Views
Verin and Graendal each have angreal of unkown strength - 03/11/2012 06:15:49 PM 773 Views
Re: Verin and Graendal each have angreal of unkown strength - 03/11/2012 10:15:10 PM 832 Views
*shrugs* - 03/11/2012 10:25:18 PM 722 Views
Re: *shrugs* - 04/11/2012 07:12:21 AM 921 Views
You have 4 markers and you should use them all - 10/11/2012 03:08:37 PM 656 Views
Indeed - 10/11/2012 03:59:51 PM 797 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 01/11/2012 06:23:07 PM 849 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 01/11/2012 09:48:04 PM 809 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 02/11/2012 09:02:58 PM 833 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 02/11/2012 09:56:50 PM 907 Views
I'll have to disagree with much of this - 03/11/2012 07:46:31 AM 861 Views
Why do you always think Strength is the point - 03/11/2012 04:35:26 PM 617 Views
I don't - I merely appreciate it as a factor - 03/11/2012 04:48:24 PM 732 Views
0 Evidence? Cyndane v. Alivia is plenty of evidence EDIT with exact quote - 03/11/2012 06:17:39 PM 787 Views
One other thing you have forgotten about - 03/11/2012 10:13:09 PM 736 Views
Your agenda blinds you to logic yet again...As I'll simply demonstrate with your example here... - 03/11/2012 11:08:13 PM 800 Views
Nope, the only experience she has in reality is against Rand - 03/11/2012 11:09:54 PM 711 Views
Nonsense. - 03/11/2012 11:11:05 PM 733 Views
Believe as you will - 03/11/2012 11:26:50 PM 902 Views
That's a classic. - 04/11/2012 12:06:13 AM 749 Views
You misquote on a regular basis and have no grasp of the timeline in the series - 04/11/2012 01:36:37 AM 651 Views
Hmm... - 04/11/2012 07:08:04 AM 954 Views
stop getting all indignant ... I'm really not trying to be nasty to you - 04/11/2012 04:20:06 PM 793 Views

Reply to Message