You can also work it backwards to make it more plausible...
We know that Egwene plus Romanda+Lelaine probably equals high Forsaken strength : x + 2y = 100
We also know that Egwene is stronger than Amys + Melaine. Amys is as strong as Moiraine and Melaine a bit less : x = 2y - 10%
Therefore (2y - 10%) + 2y = 100
Therefore 4y = 110
Therefore y = 27.5
Therefore Moiraine level is 27.5 (I've always said about 30)
Egwene's potential is still unfulfilled but is 45 at this stage
We also know that she and Aviendha are less than Rand at this stage (45 + 35 < 90)
Therefore if Moiraine is 30, then Daigian is 10. Therefore Aes Sedai fall between 10 and 30 in strength. We know that Sheriam's strength is uncommon in women, as well as Galina's. So we're looking at peak Aes Sedai strength at about 20, as we've always claimed, which corresponds to level 9 on the strength scale, pretty much fulfilling the bell curve.
You continue to make the Forsaken far too powerful. If the AS are that much weaker they never would have stood a chance at the Cleansing as none of their circles would even match the Forsaken in Strength. Flinn Corele and Sarene together only come close to Demandred if Flinn is nearly Forsaken level himself and seems unlikely. Given that his strength is almost never commented on I don't see it. And then there is Daigian's circle, I suppose Eben is like a 60 now so that they could match a Forsaken?
Step back and consider that in order to face a Forsaken successfully these circles would need to be considerably stronger to last more than a few minutes.
Step back and read the Cleansing. You continue to ignore the quotes.
1. Demandred says that Flinn's circle is as strong as he is.
2. Verin is not strong enough to shield Graendal.
It's obvious, the circles are similar in power. Not only that, but there is no way that Flinn is as skilled as Demandred. He just didn't give Demandred a chance to fight back.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
Addressing problems with the Bell Curve
- 31/10/2012 11:30:42 AM
1455 Views
Who said RJ created a 100 point scale? I always assumed we did to make this easier to follow
- 31/10/2012 02:22:51 PM
826 Views
One more point here
- 31/10/2012 03:02:34 PM
705 Views
I've think I've finally done it. I've solved the entire Curve. Daigian is the key...
- 01/11/2012 09:20:57 AM
927 Views
Did some playing with your numbers to make this work better
- 01/11/2012 02:13:00 PM
887 Views
The Mean and SD are set by Daigian's position. Your options are therefore not possible...
- 02/11/2012 07:49:24 AM
832 Views
Yet you have many more SD between the Mean and Lanfear than you do Morgase and the Mean
- 02/11/2012 02:39:51 PM
719 Views
I absolutely agree. The lower side of the curve MUST be intersected by zero after 1 SD...
- 02/11/2012 03:03:52 PM
603 Views
I am not convinced Moiraine is the Mean. Merely 50% of Lanfear
- 02/11/2012 04:23:57 PM
755 Views
But on a Bell Curve the Mean IS 50% of Lanfear. You've just disproven your own contention.
- 02/11/2012 04:40:31 PM
682 Views
OMG no it is NOT!
- 02/11/2012 05:16:36 PM
621 Views
I agree with that. But please honestly look at the math I presented. It disproves the Bell Curve.
- 02/11/2012 05:24:41 PM
894 Views
It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved.
- 02/11/2012 06:07:19 PM
727 Views
Confusing post...
- 02/11/2012 06:30:40 PM
770 Views
If you choose to ignore the author go right ahead. I just think you are wrong
- 02/11/2012 09:05:14 PM
812 Views
Re: It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved.
- 02/11/2012 07:11:57 PM
706 Views
I think the number is about 10
- 03/11/2012 08:42:08 AM
778 Views
Nope
- 03/11/2012 04:14:45 PM
711 Views
Re: Nope
- 03/11/2012 04:39:07 PM
750 Views
Verin and Graendal each have angreal of unkown strength
- 03/11/2012 06:15:49 PM
670 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve
- 01/11/2012 06:23:07 PM
760 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve
- 01/11/2012 09:48:04 PM
722 Views
I'll have to disagree with much of this
- 03/11/2012 07:46:31 AM
775 Views
Why do you always think Strength is the point
- 03/11/2012 04:35:26 PM
545 Views
I don't - I merely appreciate it as a factor
- 03/11/2012 04:48:24 PM
649 Views
0 Evidence? Cyndane v. Alivia is plenty of evidence EDIT with exact quote
- 03/11/2012 06:17:39 PM
673 Views
One other thing you have forgotten about
- 03/11/2012 10:13:09 PM
657 Views
Your agenda blinds you to logic yet again...As I'll simply demonstrate with your example here...
- 03/11/2012 11:08:13 PM
715 Views
Nope, the only experience she has in reality is against Rand
- 03/11/2012 11:09:54 PM
618 Views
Nonsense.
- 03/11/2012 11:11:05 PM
652 Views
Believe as you will
- 03/11/2012 11:26:50 PM
811 Views
That's a classic.
- 04/11/2012 12:06:13 AM
670 Views
You misquote on a regular basis and have no grasp of the timeline in the series
- 04/11/2012 01:36:37 AM
537 Views
Hmm...
- 04/11/2012 07:08:04 AM
861 Views
stop getting all indignant ... I'm really not trying to be nasty to you
- 04/11/2012 04:20:06 PM
691 Views
Reply to your EDIT: I think YOU have a totally warped perspective, based on what you wish for.
- 03/11/2012 11:16:29 PM
660 Views
Funny that's exactly how I see your perspective
- 03/11/2012 11:25:52 PM
681 Views
I don't need to interpret the following in any way other than the obvious to get the picture...
- 04/11/2012 12:17:53 AM
2242 Views
as usual you miss that there is a timeline and strength growth throughout the series *NM*
- 04/11/2012 01:47:41 AM
304 Views