I absolutely agree. The lower side of the curve MUST be intersected by zero after 1 SD...
Shannow Send a noteboard - 02/11/2012 03:03:52 PM
Which throws this entire model out the window. Ad by your reckoning Egwene is nearly as rare as Nynaeve. You are ignoring that there are 2 sides to a Bell Curve and your placements only address 1 half of it that suits your notions. I validate nothing by pointing out that you are just flat out wrong.
The fact is, this Bell Curve cannot have the Mean at half the maximum strength. Daigian's placement makes that impossible.
E.G.
If Moiraine is the Mean at 50 strength, then Daigian is one third of the Mean.
Daigian is 0.32SD from the Mean.
Meaning 0.32SD = 2/3 of the Mean.
Meaning that 1 SD = 2 times Moiraine strength.
Meaning that there are no channelers more than 0.5SD stronger or weaker than Moiraine.
This contradicts a Bell Curve, which has at least 32% of channelers beyond 1 SD.
The traditional Bell Curve is therefore refuted by the maths.
So the options are simple:
Either accept that the Bell Curve cannot apply to the channeling distribution, or else accept that the bottom half of the curve is intersected by zero just below 1 SD below the Mean.
This message last edited by Shannow on 02/11/2012 at 03:27:53 PM
Addressing problems with the Bell Curve
- 31/10/2012 11:30:42 AM
1454 Views
Who said RJ created a 100 point scale? I always assumed we did to make this easier to follow
- 31/10/2012 02:22:51 PM
826 Views
One more point here
- 31/10/2012 03:02:34 PM
705 Views
I've think I've finally done it. I've solved the entire Curve. Daigian is the key...
- 01/11/2012 09:20:57 AM
927 Views
Did some playing with your numbers to make this work better
- 01/11/2012 02:13:00 PM
887 Views
The Mean and SD are set by Daigian's position. Your options are therefore not possible...
- 02/11/2012 07:49:24 AM
831 Views
Yet you have many more SD between the Mean and Lanfear than you do Morgase and the Mean
- 02/11/2012 02:39:51 PM
719 Views
I absolutely agree. The lower side of the curve MUST be intersected by zero after 1 SD...
- 02/11/2012 03:03:52 PM
603 Views
I am not convinced Moiraine is the Mean. Merely 50% of Lanfear
- 02/11/2012 04:23:57 PM
755 Views
But on a Bell Curve the Mean IS 50% of Lanfear. You've just disproven your own contention.
- 02/11/2012 04:40:31 PM
682 Views
OMG no it is NOT!
- 02/11/2012 05:16:36 PM
621 Views
I agree with that. But please honestly look at the math I presented. It disproves the Bell Curve.
- 02/11/2012 05:24:41 PM
893 Views
It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved.
- 02/11/2012 06:07:19 PM
727 Views
Confusing post...
- 02/11/2012 06:30:40 PM
770 Views
If you choose to ignore the author go right ahead. I just think you are wrong
- 02/11/2012 09:05:14 PM
812 Views
Re: It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved.
- 02/11/2012 07:11:57 PM
706 Views
I think the number is about 10
- 03/11/2012 08:42:08 AM
778 Views
Nope
- 03/11/2012 04:14:45 PM
711 Views
Re: Nope
- 03/11/2012 04:39:07 PM
749 Views
Verin and Graendal each have angreal of unkown strength
- 03/11/2012 06:15:49 PM
670 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve
- 01/11/2012 06:23:07 PM
760 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve
- 01/11/2012 09:48:04 PM
721 Views
I'll have to disagree with much of this
- 03/11/2012 07:46:31 AM
774 Views
Why do you always think Strength is the point
- 03/11/2012 04:35:26 PM
545 Views
I don't - I merely appreciate it as a factor
- 03/11/2012 04:48:24 PM
648 Views
0 Evidence? Cyndane v. Alivia is plenty of evidence EDIT with exact quote
- 03/11/2012 06:17:39 PM
673 Views
One other thing you have forgotten about
- 03/11/2012 10:13:09 PM
657 Views
Your agenda blinds you to logic yet again...As I'll simply demonstrate with your example here...
- 03/11/2012 11:08:13 PM
714 Views
Nope, the only experience she has in reality is against Rand
- 03/11/2012 11:09:54 PM
618 Views
Nonsense.
- 03/11/2012 11:11:05 PM
652 Views
Believe as you will
- 03/11/2012 11:26:50 PM
810 Views
That's a classic.
- 04/11/2012 12:06:13 AM
670 Views
You misquote on a regular basis and have no grasp of the timeline in the series
- 04/11/2012 01:36:37 AM
537 Views
Hmm...
- 04/11/2012 07:08:04 AM
861 Views
stop getting all indignant ... I'm really not trying to be nasty to you
- 04/11/2012 04:20:06 PM
691 Views
Reply to your EDIT: I think YOU have a totally warped perspective, based on what you wish for.
- 03/11/2012 11:16:29 PM
660 Views
Funny that's exactly how I see your perspective
- 03/11/2012 11:25:52 PM
681 Views
I don't need to interpret the following in any way other than the obvious to get the picture...
- 04/11/2012 12:17:53 AM
2242 Views
as usual you miss that there is a timeline and strength growth throughout the series *NM*
- 04/11/2012 01:47:41 AM
303 Views