Here is my interpretation of the bell curve. The 21-level system is evenly distributed but the power levels on that curve are exponential.
The power of a channeller is given by l^1.21765144798273 (where l is the level on the 21-level system).* Here are a few channellers' powers given that equation (which I normalized between 0 and 1). This equation is based entirely on the following presumptions:
Egwene is exactly five times stronger that Daigan.
Egwene is level 15
Daigan is level 4
If you have better characters or corrections to these presumptions the comparison than let me know.
Lanfear 21: 1
Nynaeve 18: 0.8289
Egwene 15: 0.6638
Daigian 4: 0.1328
Morgase 1: 0.0245
*My math explained:
l^x = p (l = level, p = power)
5*4^x = 15^x (Daigan, a level 4, is 5 times weaker than Egwene, a level 15)
=log_4 5 / (log_4 15 - 1) (log base 4 here, I'm not sure what a good way of indicating that is)
=1.21765144798273
**All channellers levels were taken from http://13depository.blogspot.ca/search/label/Saidar%20strength . If you don't like the levels assigned, you can view the data it hde supplied link. If you want access to edit just give me your email address.
The power of a channeller is given by l^1.21765144798273 (where l is the level on the 21-level system).* Here are a few channellers' powers given that equation (which I normalized between 0 and 1). This equation is based entirely on the following presumptions:
Egwene is exactly five times stronger that Daigan.
Egwene is level 15
Daigan is level 4
If you have better characters or corrections to these presumptions the comparison than let me know.
Lanfear 21: 1
Nynaeve 18: 0.8289
Egwene 15: 0.6638
Daigian 4: 0.1328
Morgase 1: 0.0245
*My math explained:
l^x = p (l = level, p = power)
5*4^x = 15^x (Daigan, a level 4, is 5 times weaker than Egwene, a level 15)
=log_4 5 / (log_4 15 - 1) (log base 4 here, I'm not sure what a good way of indicating that is)
=1.21765144798273
**All channellers levels were taken from http://13depository.blogspot.ca/search/label/Saidar%20strength . If you don't like the levels assigned, you can view the data it hde supplied link. If you want access to edit just give me your email address.
Addressing problems with the Bell Curve
31/10/2012 11:30:42 AM
- 1571 Views
Who said RJ created a 100 point scale? I always assumed we did to make this easier to follow
31/10/2012 02:22:51 PM
- 914 Views
One more point here
31/10/2012 03:02:34 PM
- 789 Views
I've think I've finally done it. I've solved the entire Curve. Daigian is the key...
01/11/2012 09:20:57 AM
- 1025 Views
Did some playing with your numbers to make this work better
01/11/2012 02:13:00 PM
- 979 Views
The Mean and SD are set by Daigian's position. Your options are therefore not possible...
02/11/2012 07:49:24 AM
- 938 Views
Yet you have many more SD between the Mean and Lanfear than you do Morgase and the Mean
02/11/2012 02:39:51 PM
- 802 Views
I absolutely agree. The lower side of the curve MUST be intersected by zero after 1 SD...
02/11/2012 03:03:52 PM
- 675 Views
I am not convinced Moiraine is the Mean. Merely 50% of Lanfear
02/11/2012 04:23:57 PM
- 852 Views
But on a Bell Curve the Mean IS 50% of Lanfear. You've just disproven your own contention.
02/11/2012 04:40:31 PM
- 768 Views
OMG no it is NOT!
02/11/2012 05:16:36 PM
- 671 Views
I agree with that. But please honestly look at the math I presented. It disproves the Bell Curve.
02/11/2012 05:24:41 PM
- 970 Views
It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved.
02/11/2012 06:07:19 PM
- 804 Views
Confusing post...
02/11/2012 06:30:40 PM
- 865 Views
If you choose to ignore the author go right ahead. I just think you are wrong
02/11/2012 09:05:14 PM
- 897 Views
Re: It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved.
02/11/2012 07:11:57 PM
- 793 Views
I think the number is about 10
03/11/2012 08:42:08 AM
- 868 Views
Nope
03/11/2012 04:14:45 PM
- 791 Views
Re: Nope
03/11/2012 04:39:07 PM
- 827 Views
Verin and Graendal each have angreal of unkown strength
03/11/2012 06:15:49 PM
- 773 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve
01/11/2012 06:23:07 PM
- 850 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve
01/11/2012 09:48:04 PM
- 810 Views
I'll have to disagree with much of this
03/11/2012 07:46:31 AM
- 862 Views
Why do you always think Strength is the point
03/11/2012 04:35:26 PM
- 617 Views
I don't - I merely appreciate it as a factor
03/11/2012 04:48:24 PM
- 732 Views
0 Evidence? Cyndane v. Alivia is plenty of evidence EDIT with exact quote
03/11/2012 06:17:39 PM
- 788 Views
One other thing you have forgotten about
03/11/2012 10:13:09 PM
- 737 Views
Your agenda blinds you to logic yet again...As I'll simply demonstrate with your example here...
03/11/2012 11:08:13 PM
- 800 Views
Nope, the only experience she has in reality is against Rand
03/11/2012 11:09:54 PM
- 712 Views
Nonsense.
03/11/2012 11:11:05 PM
- 734 Views
Believe as you will
03/11/2012 11:26:50 PM
- 903 Views
That's a classic.
04/11/2012 12:06:13 AM
- 749 Views
You misquote on a regular basis and have no grasp of the timeline in the series
04/11/2012 01:36:37 AM
- 652 Views
Hmm...
04/11/2012 07:08:04 AM
- 955 Views
stop getting all indignant ... I'm really not trying to be nasty to you
04/11/2012 04:20:06 PM
- 794 Views
Reply to your EDIT: I think YOU have a totally warped perspective, based on what you wish for.
03/11/2012 11:16:29 PM
- 746 Views
Funny that's exactly how I see your perspective
03/11/2012 11:25:52 PM
- 763 Views
I don't need to interpret the following in any way other than the obvious to get the picture...
04/11/2012 12:17:53 AM
- 2321 Views
as usual you miss that there is a timeline and strength growth throughout the series *NM*
04/11/2012 01:47:41 AM
- 335 Views