Active Users:345 Time:07/07/2025 01:41:43 AM
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM

Egwene should have found 100,000 novices and a control group to fit into your theory.

If passing through miscellaneous villages, testing everyone, and accepting everyone isn't a random sample then god help us all.


1. The AS did not go about testing every woman they saw. They tested and accepted any woman who approached them. It's a very different thing.

2. While there is "randomness" in how these women came to join the AS camp, there is nothing to say they are also "representative" of all women with the ability to Channel. In fact we know for certain they are not representative as they are as a whole too weak.

As I've been discussing with Tor there are many potential reasons for this group not being representative of the total channeling population, personally I think it's some level of genetic culling in the region, sort of the reverse as we've seen in the TR where there is a disproportionate number of strong channelers.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1536 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 917 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1491 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 915 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 835 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 778 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 796 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 793 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 811 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 842 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 744 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 720 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 747 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 897 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 757 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 698 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 704 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 801 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 704 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 790 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 713 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 730 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 726 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 721 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1460 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 983 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 822 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 681 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1490 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1024 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 806 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 670 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 749 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 840 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 388 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 769 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 727 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 727 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 799 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 809 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 830 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 871 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 826 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 853 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 424 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 771 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 710 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 831 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 665 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1318 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 763 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 768 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 711 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 911 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 835 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 836 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 742 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1074 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 852 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 730 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 863 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 976 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 838 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 811 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 820 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 797 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 817 Views

Reply to Message