Active Users:360 Time:02/07/2025 02:27:27 AM
I don't think it plays much role in the plot darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM
1000 women of a potential field of perhaps millions is a tiny sample, especially when regionally skewed. All that added to the facts the author laid out make it obvious to me that these Novices are non-representative. Personally I think most of the purpose they served was to show that there are a huge number of potential Channelers in the world and that women like Sharina could be hidden almost anywhere


1000 is not a tiny sample, whether there were a million or a billon channeling women. That's just a fact.

However, it is certainly possible that Norther Alataran women are generally weak in the power. Personally, though, I believe Jordan just came up with some percentages to sound scientific, and didn't take the concequences of that in his writing. It's a shame we can't ask him what his thinking was.

Also, why do you bother discussing the bell curve if you feel it is perfectly reasonable for the author to disregard it if he wants to make the already obvious point that strong channelers could crop up anywhere?


Knowing it exists and having it effect the books are two different things. The author has creative license to introduce any strength Channelers he likes because the VAST majority of the Bell Curve will remain unseen and have no effect on the story. It only matters for these discussions.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1533 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 917 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1491 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 915 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 835 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 778 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 796 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 793 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 811 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 841 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 741 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 719 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 747 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 896 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 757 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 698 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 704 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 800 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 703 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 789 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 713 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 730 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 725 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 721 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1459 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 983 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 819 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 681 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1489 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1018 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 806 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 670 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 749 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 840 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 388 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 769 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 726 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 726 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 797 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 808 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 829 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 870 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 826 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 852 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 424 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 771 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 710 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 831 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 665 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1318 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 763 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 767 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 711 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 911 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 835 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 836 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 741 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1070 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 851 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 730 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 862 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 976 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 838 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 810 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 820 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 797 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 816 Views

Reply to Message