Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
TheCrownless Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
I was always under the impression that they relied on people who came to the tower, they did very little active recruitment and relied on people coming to the Tower, very few of these will be wilders (who are supposed to be stronger?). That way most modern Aes Sedai representation is below what would be "average".
I don't agree about the circle maths though, I always got the impression being in a circle allowed you to do things you couldn't do as 3 individuals but your combined "power" wasn't that of a single channeler who had the combined strength of the 3 in the circle.
As has been pointed out though, your assertion that the highest is exactly twice as powerful as the middle is wrong though, bell curves by their nature don't allow that kind of detail. It's very possible Rand is an outlier many standard deviations of the mean away from the mean. I imagine in actuality he's rather closer than that but it's worth noting for the calculations as it's impossible for the population to actually be a bell curve.
I don't agree about the circle maths though, I always got the impression being in a circle allowed you to do things you couldn't do as 3 individuals but your combined "power" wasn't that of a single channeler who had the combined strength of the 3 in the circle.
As has been pointed out though, your assertion that the highest is exactly twice as powerful as the middle is wrong though, bell curves by their nature don't allow that kind of detail. It's very possible Rand is an outlier many standard deviations of the mean away from the mean. I imagine in actuality he's rather closer than that but it's worth noting for the calculations as it's impossible for the population to actually be a bell curve.
Come to the dark side, We have candy!
I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
This message last edited by TheCrownless on 30/10/2012 at 12:12:51 AM
The Bell Curve revisited
29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
- 1464 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
- 861 Views
That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
- 1422 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
- 870 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
- 717 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
- 712 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
- 798 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
- 703 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
- 781 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
- 996 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
- 763 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
- 746 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
- 759 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
- 688 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
- 664 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
- 707 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
- 646 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
- 644 Views
Absolutely no reason...
30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
- 749 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
- 647 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
- 736 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
- 659 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
- 674 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
- 671 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
- 669 Views
Done
31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
- 1339 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
- 921 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
- 705 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
- 701 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
- 787 Views
That's not what happened...
30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
- 709 Views
I hate to get into these things
29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
- 813 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
- 769 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
- 799 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
- 397 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
- 721 Views
You're pathetic...
30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
- 660 Views
The quote isn't specific
30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
- 780 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
- 1262 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
- 714 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
- 658 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
- 858 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
- 778 Views
Are you sure about that?
30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
- 782 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
- 690 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
- 974 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
- 790 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
- 676 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
- 797 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
- 757 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
- 582 Views
you're confusing 2 things
30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
- 844 Views
One thing
30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
- 748 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
- 760 Views