Active Users:1024 Time:16/10/2025 01:25:14 PM
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this Tor Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
Look at the TR for instance. We've seen many more uber-channelers come from that tiny region and a much higher % that would be expected from such a small region. Dozens of men and women have been picked up by both Towers from the TR and they are ALL strong enough to be AS.

You are both trying to apply a total population % to isolated regional variations and tiny populations of the overall channeling pool.


Again, 1000 is not a tiny sample, and, also again, aren't you now saying that genetics is relevant to sampling strength? What other explanation could there be for regional variations?
Fram kamerater!
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1588 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 964 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1548 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 951 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 889 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 827 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 836 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 830 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 847 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 886 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 791 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 771 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 786 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 935 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 799 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 736 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 746 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 839 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 746 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 836 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 763 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 770 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 772 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 757 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1521 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1030 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 862 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 722 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1537 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1084 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 857 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 706 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 789 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 883 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 410 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 826 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 762 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 772 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 840 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 847 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 878 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 918 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 890 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 901 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 475 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 820 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 754 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 870 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 710 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1368 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 807 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 822 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 771 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 948 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 882 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 873 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 792 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1116 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 889 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 767 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 904 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1027 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 898 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 878 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 865 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 849 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 862 Views

Reply to Message