Active Users:1010 Time:16/09/2025 04:06:37 AM
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed HousealThor Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
Because of the fact that it doesn't seem possible to have negative strength in the OP. I don't know if RJ realized that a normal distribution would mean negative strength is possible, though.

The more I think about it, the more I think it has to be skewed. It's the only way Egwene and Aviendha can both be above the overall population mean given the quote about both of them together matching Lanfear.

And now, I've spent about 3x as much time thinking about this as I had wanted to :<img class=' />
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1559 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 944 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1524 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 938 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 864 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 810 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 820 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 817 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 833 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 869 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 777 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 753 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 772 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 920 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 781 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 720 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 730 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 824 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 727 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 822 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 740 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 755 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 756 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 742 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1487 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1010 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 847 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 706 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1516 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1062 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 837 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 692 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 776 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 865 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 401 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 809 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 748 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 753 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 822 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 830 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 860 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 899 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 859 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 881 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 452 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 803 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 741 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 856 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 693 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1342 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 791 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 798 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 755 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 937 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 867 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 862 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 771 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1099 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 872 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 751 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 885 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1004 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 871 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 847 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 844 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 831 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 846 Views

Reply to Message