Active Users:1397 Time:05/02/2025 08:10:33 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well... Shannow Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
I cannot comment on their state of mind. They dogmatically try and fit the data into the Bell Curve distribution, which simply cannot apply in the way that they wish it to. The evidence refutes it.


I get the impression that what they are disputing is that the distribution of strengths has changed since the Age of Legends.


We need to take a step back to understand that argument.

We have established that a normal distribution (Bell Curve) does not represent channeler strength as demonstrated in the books.

In order to therefore try and solve this problem, I have proposed various potential solutions. ONE of these potential solutions was that the distribution has changed since the Age of Legends.

But that is only a solution proposed to try and make the data fit the Bell Curve requirement. In other words, because the data patently does not represent a Bell Curve TODAY, the only way to make a Bell Curve fit, is to propose that a DIFFERENT distribution applied to it in the Age of Legends.

But that is not necessary if you accept the possibility of a skewed distribution, which by definition then is not a Bell Curve.

A skewed distribution is what you are advocating, and which I firmly believe is a true representation of channeler strength.

But those vocal supporters of the Bell Curve will most certainly not support a skewed distribution. Hence, we are back to square one as far as they are concerned.

This message last edited by Shannow on 29/10/2012 at 11:05:18 AM
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited Shannow - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1463 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited Tor - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 860 Views
That's incorrect... Shannow - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1421 Views
Re: That's incorrect... Tor - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 870 Views
Re: That's incorrect... Shannow - 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM 716 Views
Re: That's incorrect... Tor - 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM 711 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well... Shannow - 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM 797 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well... Tor - 29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM 702 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well... Shannow - 29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM 781 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken darius_sedai - 31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM 995 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... fionwe1987 - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 763 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... Shannow - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 728 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... Tor - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 745 Views
Exactly... Shannow - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 739 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this darius_sedai - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 759 Views
Excellent point. fionwe1987 - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 784 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this Tor - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 687 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 663 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role Tor - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 692 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 835 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 707 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? fionwe1987 - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 646 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? Tor - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 644 Views
Absolutely no reason... fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 749 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... Tor - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 646 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 735 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. Tor - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 659 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 673 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! Tor - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 671 Views
Go read a stats text will you? fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 668 Views
Done Tor - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1339 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... fionwe1987 - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 920 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... Tor - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 704 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 621 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... Tor - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1364 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... Tor - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 884 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply? Tor - 01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM 700 Views
Still nothing? Tor - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 673 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference Praziquantel - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 612 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference fionwe1987 - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 698 Views
Yes that totally makes sense Sidious - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 787 Views
Thank you! *NM* Tor - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 363 Views
That's not what happened... fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 708 Views
Re: That's not what happened... Tor - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 668 Views
Who said it would? fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 679 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 727 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series Sidious - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 751 Views
But of course he did.. fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 778 Views
I hate to get into these things HousealThor - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 813 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... Shannow - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 768 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed HousealThor - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 799 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* fionwe1987 - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 396 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... Shannow - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 720 Views
You're pathetic... fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 660 Views
The quote isn't specific Sidious - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 779 Views
Its highly specific... fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 612 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1261 Views
Honestly! darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 708 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed Tor - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 714 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it HousealThor - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 658 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? TheCrownless - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 857 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? Tor - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 777 Views
Are you sure about that? TheCrownless - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 782 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? Tor - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 690 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me TheCrownless - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 973 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 789 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola TheCrownless - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 675 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 796 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers TheCrownless - 31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM 757 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler darius_sedai - 31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM 582 Views
you're confusing 2 things Zaphod - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 843 Views
+1 *NM* Sidious - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 772 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things Simon - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 756 Views
Not true... Shannow - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 769 Views
One thing HousealThor - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 748 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 759 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes