Active Users:1122 Time:22/11/2024 02:54:34 PM
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 02:23:27 AM

Oh, ok. I always assumed the levels were evenly distributed. Do you know if there exists a large collection of channeler strengths, enough to make a plot?

I guess making a comprehensive list would be like the mother of all those riddles where you get information like "The man in house number two drinks wine" and "The French officer is the neighbour of the man who has a dog".

I'm sure a full list of channelers exists in RJ's notes. I doubt we'll ever see it.

And I don't see why you would want to make a curve. Its not like what RJ said was a hypothesis that has to be proved. This is his world. His word is law.

If RJ said it, why are we discussing it? Do you have a link to the quote?

We're having this discussion because Shannow is a doofus.

Here are the quotes:
For Papazen, while I have spoken of souls being born with the ability to channel in response to questions, I think of it as being genetic also. In the Age of Legends, between 2 and 3% of people had some ability, following a bell curve distribution in strength. For over 3000 years, though, Aes Sedai have been removing men who actually learned to channel from the gene pool. They have been very efficient at this. As a result, the "present day" sees about 1% of the population who can learn to channel, with a much, much smaller percentage of that being born with the spark.

Regarding the percentage of women who could test for the shawl, it would be 62.5% of the bellcurve. I'll leave the maths to you for an idle moment. The question doesn't really apply to men, since the Black Tower accepts anyone who can learn to channel, but if the White Tower limits were applied, it would be roughly 65.4% of the bellcurve. Although, considering the effectiveness question, they should probably set it at the same 62.5%. Again, the maths are all yours. Regarding the levels of male strength, while the weakest man and the weakest woman would be roughly equivalent, you might say that there are several levels of male strength on top of the female levels. Remember to integrate this with what I've said elsewhere about effectiveness, though.


These two quotes tell us that there was a bell curve distribution in strength, not strength levels. And the way RJ referred to "the" bell curve in the second quote (which he had previously only used to describe the AoL channelers) makes it clear there's only one bell curve.

There's also this:

LUCKERS
Is strength in the power evenly distributed? Would on a scale of one to one hundred the most channelers be on the 50 mark? (within a gender, of course).
MARIA SIMONS
Jim described it as a bell curve, with most channelers in the middle.


Again, strength in the Power is the "it" in Maria's answer, and obviously most channelers would fall at the mid point.

But really, 67.5% of the channeling population strong enough to be Aes Sedai? Aren't they sending away a majority of the novices and accepted because they aren't strong enough? Or is it because the majority don't have "what it takes to be Aes Sedai"?

It is 62.5%. And the reason we don't see large numbers of Aes Sedai is that they haven't been actively recruiting, like the Black Tower. As we see with the 1000 novices who join the Rebels in response to Egwene's call (only about 200 of them are strong enough to be Aes Sedai), the subset of the population interested in becoming Aes Sedai is a bad sampling for the subset of the population that can become Aes Sedai. And the traditional Tower consisted mostly of women exclusively from the first type of sample.
Reply to message
Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 24/10/2012 06:40:47 PM 2769 Views
Did Perva actually initiate the link or was it Androl? *NM* - 24/10/2012 07:02:15 PM 686 Views
Androl did. *NM* - 25/10/2012 05:10:31 AM 940 Views
But didn't Nynaeve do it first at the cleansing? - 25/10/2012 12:43:15 PM 1095 Views
Pevara was thinking on very sketchy information. - 25/10/2012 08:56:20 PM 1023 Views
did he start the link? or just take it? - 27/10/2012 07:33:49 AM 750 Views
I think it's slightly off - 28/10/2012 04:21:05 PM 1030 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 05:13:43 AM 1249 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 04:23:20 PM 1073 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 09:52:03 PM 1122 Views
Travelling - 25/10/2012 08:56:41 AM 1111 Views
Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 04:21:53 PM 1109 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 06:12:21 PM 1019 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 08:50:15 PM 978 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 09:45:26 PM 1052 Views
Weren't there 150 or so at Maradon? *NM* - 26/10/2012 03:29:53 PM 601 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 26/10/2012 08:49:58 PM 1162 Views
Perhaps, but if no on in the AoL could do it when mixed circles were common - 28/10/2012 04:22:20 PM 855 Views
How strong Pevara is... - 25/10/2012 07:08:26 PM 1186 Views
I'm pretty sure Moiraine is closer to 30... - 25/10/2012 07:41:37 PM 918 Views
Agreed - 25/10/2012 08:37:24 PM 1012 Views
So... the old story of ignore the bell curve, eh? - 26/10/2012 01:40:49 AM 967 Views
No, I fully respect the bell curve - 26/10/2012 01:51:34 PM 1024 Views
That was disproved long ago... - 26/10/2012 01:36:24 AM 956 Views
But Moiraine isn't 'exceptionally strong' - 26/10/2012 05:16:10 AM 1022 Views
Not particularly strong evidence for that last. - 26/10/2012 05:36:54 AM 972 Views
But we know that it takes significantly more strength to maintain multiple weaves - 26/10/2012 08:14:58 AM 892 Views
Not true - 27/10/2012 09:15:51 PM 896 Views
Not accurate - 27/10/2012 09:31:05 PM 902 Views
The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 10:27:34 AM 957 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 11:40:04 AM 949 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:32:01 PM 873 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:48:51 PM 971 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:07:39 PM 956 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:18:32 PM 985 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:57:18 PM 1046 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 28/10/2012 02:07:39 PM 738 Views
Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 27/10/2012 09:39:58 PM 1042 Views
The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 01:50:37 AM 880 Views
Re: The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 02:01:59 PM 928 Views
You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 02:41:49 PM 945 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 05:39:12 PM 856 Views
I need to come and save you from blatant fallacies being spouted by the loonies. - 28/10/2012 05:56:21 PM 846 Views
This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 02:58:51 AM 822 Views
Re: This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 01:10:35 PM 1026 Views
So what's your conclusion? - 29/10/2012 02:14:33 PM 793 Views
His conclusion is that RJ was right about the books he wrote... - 29/10/2012 02:19:59 PM 943 Views
Pretty much... - 30/10/2012 12:57:41 AM 1024 Views
Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:16:39 PM 788 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 913 Views
You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:22:47 PM 805 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:41:48 PM 842 Views
I think the point is that the AS didn't go force every woman in the area - 29/10/2012 07:57:59 PM 806 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:23:22 PM 931 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:57:11 PM 933 Views
He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 12:49:09 AM 818 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 07:43:54 AM 863 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 01:57:05 PM 853 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:00 AM 856 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 07:49:57 AM 887 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:05:45 PM 1218 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:25:11 PM 905 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:17 AM 961 Views
AS recruiting is minimal - 28/10/2012 10:41:29 PM 883 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 02:23:27 AM 862 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 07:33:44 AM 836 Views
Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:26:27 PM 845 Views
Re: Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:42:07 PM 838 Views
You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:25:57 PM 844 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:36:45 PM 883 Views
Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 08:05:33 PM 886 Views
Re: Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 09:04:02 PM 898 Views
Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 12:39:53 AM 850 Views
Re: Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 09:45:58 AM 833 Views
Not really - 30/10/2012 02:49:05 PM 815 Views
Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:04:18 AM 810 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 09:42:35 AM 961 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:51:03 PM 810 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 02:21:04 PM 866 Views
YEah, there's no point debating this... - 30/10/2012 02:46:39 PM 813 Views
Genetics plays a role - 30/10/2012 03:03:41 PM 960 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 08:22:40 PM 810 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 09:06:08 PM 846 Views
Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 01:06:29 AM 827 Views
Re: Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 09:48:16 AM 752 Views
Nope... - 30/10/2012 01:43:56 PM 969 Views
Re: Nope... - 30/10/2012 02:34:51 PM 805 Views
Oh my... - 30/10/2012 02:50:12 PM 892 Views
Thought experment time! Hurrah! - 30/10/2012 03:27:01 PM 821 Views
But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:30:59 PM 754 Views
Re: But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:36:03 PM 856 Views
LOL - 30/10/2012 04:49:06 PM 1373 Views
Re: Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 28/10/2012 01:39:55 PM 823 Views
The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 04:18:55 PM 858 Views
Re: The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 05:21:44 PM 851 Views
The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 05:39:42 PM 932 Views
The fact is, Moiraine is not half as strong as Lanfear, hence she is below average strength. - 28/10/2012 06:02:04 PM 864 Views
How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 02:59:49 AM 888 Views
Re: How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 07:04:15 PM 863 Views
Not so - 29/10/2012 08:09:29 PM 832 Views
Re: Not so - 29/10/2012 08:43:16 PM 906 Views
Sure it is - 30/10/2012 01:43:39 AM 794 Views
Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:20:14 PM 832 Views
Re: Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:38:11 PM 853 Views
Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 01:12:26 AM 874 Views
Re: Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 09:23:37 AM 915 Views
Cadsuane is just below Egwene... - 30/10/2012 01:37:54 PM 836 Views
Your strength scores don't square with the Pevara quote - 30/10/2012 03:15:22 PM 840 Views
Re: The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 07:36:36 PM 856 Views
On Raw strength scores I think you are pretty inline with my thinking - 27/10/2012 09:37:25 PM 998 Views
And the facing a Foresaken comment is out of context anyway... - 28/10/2012 01:56:12 AM 959 Views
Excellent point on raw v. Effective strength *NM* - 28/10/2012 04:13:21 PM 601 Views

Reply to Message