Active Users:345 Time:03/07/2025 07:01:58 AM
A possible (pessimistic) explanation RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 27/09/2012 02:38:06 AM
TOM was released in fairly rushed fashion, as was TGS if memory serves. It may be that Tor was constrained by the desire to get the book(s) out as quickly as possible in scheduling the release of pre-book material so close to the pub dates. Put another way, it may have been that Tor would have preferred to have the kind of three-month lead-up that an October 2 release date would have allowed than the rush job the last two books required.

By way of comparison, Tor began publishing the prologue and sample chapters from The Way of Kings on June 10, 2010 and published the book itself on August 31, a little shy of three months later.

Having said that, this comparison leaves us with no explanation for why Chapter 1 of AMOL was released so soon after the prologue and why the chapter included no release date for the book.

For comparison's sake, does anyone remember how far from the release date the WH or COT prologues and sample chapters were released?
This message last edited by RandAllThor on 27/09/2012 at 02:43:29 PM
Reply to message
Chapter 1 (full chapter) - 26/09/2012 02:27:32 PM 2017 Views
Makes you pay for the prologue, gives chapter 1 away for free...smh *NM* - 26/09/2012 03:41:37 PM 376 Views
It's been that way for years... - 26/09/2012 03:43:12 PM 747 Views
Chapter 2 will likely be coming in audiobook form as well. *NM* - 26/09/2012 03:57:10 PM 361 Views
And we'll most likely get chapter 11 in full too. *NM* - 26/09/2012 04:30:58 PM 329 Views
Re: And we'll most likely get chapter 11 in full too. - 26/09/2012 05:53:49 PM 882 Views
Possible early release for AMOL - 26/09/2012 06:28:23 PM 818 Views
Re: Possible early release for AMOL - 26/09/2012 09:01:11 PM 904 Views
Re: And we'll most likely get chapter 11 in full too. - 26/09/2012 06:33:58 PM 755 Views
Yeah, Luckers and I discussed this earlier. - 26/09/2012 06:36:14 PM 929 Views
Good.... - 26/09/2012 08:42:17 PM 906 Views
Re: Good.... - 26/09/2012 09:28:46 PM 674 Views
Re: Good.... - 26/09/2012 10:03:19 PM 781 Views
There are a lot of logistics they would need to move up for this - 26/09/2012 11:05:36 PM 754 Views
Amazon doesn't have any problem shipping early - 27/09/2012 12:27:27 AM 735 Views
Tee hee - 27/09/2012 12:36:10 AM 806 Views
Some of the pre-orders that were moved up were significant. - 27/09/2012 12:43:25 AM 833 Views
I fully agree... - 27/09/2012 01:50:01 AM 804 Views
Random double post *NM* - 26/09/2012 11:05:37 PM 327 Views
I suspect a November release date - 27/09/2012 12:40:03 AM 844 Views
I tend to favor a December release myself. - 27/09/2012 12:49:03 AM 690 Views
12.12.12 would be funny.... *NM* - 27/09/2012 02:10:14 AM 360 Views
Hmmm... - 27/09/2012 02:04:59 AM 841 Views
A possible (pessimistic) explanation - 27/09/2012 02:38:06 AM 925 Views
For what it's worth - 27/09/2012 05:41:29 PM 700 Views
Confused... - 27/09/2012 02:32:53 AM 788 Views
Ignore the inner tightwad and do a test... - 26/09/2012 04:56:30 PM 1111 Views

Reply to Message