Active Users:2302 Time:19/01/2025 09:22:52 PM
A possible (pessimistic) explanation RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 27/09/2012 02:38:06 AM
TOM was released in fairly rushed fashion, as was TGS if memory serves. It may be that Tor was constrained by the desire to get the book(s) out as quickly as possible in scheduling the release of pre-book material so close to the pub dates. Put another way, it may have been that Tor would have preferred to have the kind of three-month lead-up that an October 2 release date would have allowed than the rush job the last two books required.

By way of comparison, Tor began publishing the prologue and sample chapters from The Way of Kings on June 10, 2010 and published the book itself on August 31, a little shy of three months later.

Having said that, this comparison leaves us with no explanation for why Chapter 1 of AMOL was released so soon after the prologue and why the chapter included no release date for the book.

For comparison's sake, does anyone remember how far from the release date the WH or COT prologues and sample chapters were released?
This message last edited by RandAllThor on 27/09/2012 at 02:43:29 PM
Reply to message
Chapter 1 (full chapter) - 26/09/2012 02:27:32 PM 1937 Views
Makes you pay for the prologue, gives chapter 1 away for free...smh *NM* - 26/09/2012 03:41:37 PM 343 Views
It's been that way for years... - 26/09/2012 03:43:12 PM 666 Views
Chapter 2 will likely be coming in audiobook form as well. *NM* - 26/09/2012 03:57:10 PM 323 Views
And we'll most likely get chapter 11 in full too. *NM* - 26/09/2012 04:30:58 PM 297 Views
Re: And we'll most likely get chapter 11 in full too. - 26/09/2012 05:53:49 PM 805 Views
Possible early release for AMOL - 26/09/2012 06:28:23 PM 718 Views
Re: Possible early release for AMOL - 26/09/2012 09:01:11 PM 816 Views
Re: And we'll most likely get chapter 11 in full too. - 26/09/2012 06:33:58 PM 673 Views
Yeah, Luckers and I discussed this earlier. - 26/09/2012 06:36:14 PM 846 Views
Good.... - 26/09/2012 08:42:17 PM 812 Views
Re: Good.... - 26/09/2012 09:28:46 PM 586 Views
Re: Good.... - 26/09/2012 10:03:19 PM 696 Views
There are a lot of logistics they would need to move up for this - 26/09/2012 11:05:36 PM 670 Views
Amazon doesn't have any problem shipping early - 27/09/2012 12:27:27 AM 658 Views
Tee hee - 27/09/2012 12:36:10 AM 716 Views
Some of the pre-orders that were moved up were significant. - 27/09/2012 12:43:25 AM 739 Views
I fully agree... - 27/09/2012 01:50:01 AM 717 Views
Random double post *NM* - 26/09/2012 11:05:37 PM 291 Views
I suspect a November release date - 27/09/2012 12:40:03 AM 757 Views
I tend to favor a December release myself. - 27/09/2012 12:49:03 AM 603 Views
12.12.12 would be funny.... *NM* - 27/09/2012 02:10:14 AM 328 Views
Hmmm... - 27/09/2012 02:04:59 AM 757 Views
A possible (pessimistic) explanation - 27/09/2012 02:38:06 AM 842 Views
For what it's worth - 27/09/2012 05:41:29 PM 619 Views
Confused... - 27/09/2012 02:32:53 AM 704 Views
Ignore the inner tightwad and do a test... - 26/09/2012 04:56:30 PM 1025 Views

Reply to Message