Active Users:595 Time:23/12/2024 04:21:44 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? Froggles Send a noteboard - 20/09/2012 07:41:36 PM
People refers to a group as a whole, persons refers to a number of individuals acting independently.
Reply to message
AMoL Prologue: DAMMIT SANDERSON! They are MEN and WOMEN, not PERSONS!!!!!!! Cannoli - 19/09/2012 10:25:42 PM 1504 Views
Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? *NM* Dark Knight - 19/09/2012 10:50:22 PM 340 Views
My point would have been lost, since "people" is used in WoT-proper for mixed groups. *NM* Cannoli - 19/09/2012 11:12:58 PM 310 Views
Re: Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? Froggles - 20/09/2012 07:41:36 PM 676 Views
Tell me, honestly. Nate - 20/09/2012 01:52:41 AM 1205 Views
Contractions Terez - 20/09/2012 05:16:56 AM 884 Views
Oh Terez, Nargs - 20/09/2012 05:36:23 AM 912 Views
100% Death of Narg *NM* Terez - 20/09/2012 06:03:06 AM 313 Views
Oh Terez... Nargs - 20/09/2012 09:07:32 AM 803 Views
Yes, it's called disdain for trollery *NM* Terez - 20/09/2012 09:12:21 AM 344 Views
Oh Terez, Nargs - 20/09/2012 04:29:52 PM 635 Views
That's ... actually not entirely correct. Nate - 20/09/2012 06:53:03 AM 900 Views
I did notice that on my reread Terez - 20/09/2012 07:19:57 AM 727 Views
It's how they're used and by whom Cannoli - 20/09/2012 12:01:35 PM 980 Views
Oh Cannoli, Nargs - 20/09/2012 05:26:34 AM 816 Views
I kinda felt the same way about his use of "squished" in the first paragraph of the book. meh *NM* Bookwyrm - 21/09/2012 06:49:58 AM 454 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes